![]() |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif too bad you think of me like this, also to bad to write something like that about a person http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif
Not following you, Sparhawk. Did Stone's remark offend you http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif ? |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
well ok maybe my english is not that good: so I could be mistaken. And if I'm mistaken Then here are my apologies for stone mill.
Edit: My english is poor, sorry about that. working on it [ June 05, 2003, 15:40: Message edited by: sparhawk ] |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
Spar-
No, please understand... that was meant as a compliment! Please don't take offense. "Gutsy" loosely means brave, willing to take the risk. To be more clear: it means you are willing to forego using defenses to apply pressure to an opponent early in the game. It is a good strategy to be able to use, because the threat of an early attack keeps your opponent off balance and guessing. I hope you did not misinterpret my words. Sorry about that. I certainly respect you. |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
edit my email, see two below http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif
[ June 05, 2003, 15:41: Message edited by: sparhawk ] |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
Thanks, Sparhawk http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
Well... I certainly should be aware of using slang terms. It was a poor choice of a word on my part. It is sometimes difficult to convey meaning on a message board with so many different audiences. One thing I constantly admire is that we have friends here from all over the world... who don't mind at all blowing up each other's empires... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
King Title Defense: Stone Mill vs. RexTorres, Turn 59?
The pot is boiling. Update on three fronts: North: A sizable fleet of enemy ships boldly contested the Mercator outpost, using a credible strategy of breaking apart into smaller task forces to commence raids behind my lines. Mercator commanders were ready and scrambled together elite forces to extinguish the threat, without many losses. Center: The main Mercator assault force successfully raided a deep enemy system, planets were either abondoned or destroyed. Rex's defenses pulled back, most likely to get first shot at the warp point. Raid still at large. South: The pileup continues on the enemy outpost, 30+ ships. I have since recolonized my outpost, and protected it with a medium fleet, slowly reinforced to about 15 ships. The enemy has just detached a medium (12) sized raid force and is coming my way. Also, I think I am getting plucked with infrequent ship bomb intel attacks, but they are easily shaken off without consequence. [ June 05, 2003, 16:07: Message edited by: Stone Mill ] |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
Quote:
[ June 05, 2003, 16:12: Message edited by: Slynky ] |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
Quote:
|
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
i have had the one system away start in 2 games now.
One I lost on turn 33... the other one I lost the homeworld but carried on and won it. |
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
Yes, thanks.
I think I'm just having a bad hair day http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.