Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

Just to point out, Stormie, I didn't "promise" not to flame you. And funny how it's "profanity" when I use an acronym with a prominent 4 letter word, but apparently isn't when you do the same, including the same 4 letter word's initial?

And I didn't flame you - I stated my opinion of you. And it stands, given that you lied, and lied, and, "you lied like a salesman, selling flies" http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif with all your statements about my lying, etc.

And, sweetcheeks? Again - saying I have no interest in flaming you isn't promising that I won't. And if you keep misrepresenting things, I may. ( Then again, at the moment you have a posse of fanboys who won't be swayed from thinking you're the bees knees, which suits your messiah complex just fine. )

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

Hmm. In this context, www.dictionary.com defines a "flame" as "an insulting criticism or remark meant to incite anger, as on a computer network". It's a bit hard to see how stating your opinion of Stormbinder with the words "whining irritating self-righteous pompous snit" falls outside that definition.

And well-deserved adulation it is, too. I know that I could never have survived the stream of abuse emanating from Norfleet's supporters long enough to produce the goods. Again, well done Stormbinder - we are all in your debt.

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

mmmmmm'kay

Let's everybody just take a deep breath.

This thread has served its purpose which was to express concern and curiosity over Stormbinder's findings, the thread and its closure, and what had really happened.

This back and forth is only enjoyable for you two and is certainly not garnering any further support to either of your "sides". You are just making yourselves and each other look petulant and silly.


On a slightly lighter note,

I certainly hope that when further information regarding the events of the Last week becomes understood and 'cleared' for public consumption, that it will be disseminated swiftly to the forum.

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

In other words you can't post any proof of anything you just said here about me. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif No surprise, since both you and me knows very well that I never harrased you, I never send you any emails or PM Messages other than few I listed above, you never asked me not to send Messages to you (just because I didn't ) and I never used mine acronym FOAD, unlike yourself who keep using it again and again. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif You, however, insulted my in few dozens of your Posts just during Last few days.


But I'll let it lay, since as I said I have no interest in flamewars with you, so you could display your "famous" flame skills that you braged so much about, and start poisoning athmospheres this board just when it become clearer, with flamewars you love so much.

Just keep in mind, that like I said, in the future any profanity, insults or flames from you directed at me or any other player will be promptly reported to Moderators. You are not going to turn this forum into another medium of yours, where "people will be talking about your flames years after you are gone", as in your other forums, according to you. Don't even try.

Stormbinder

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

You are absolutely right. I just simply wanted to make sure that there will be no future flamewars between me and even most zealous and loyal of Norfleet supporters, now that he is exposed and gone. That's the only reason why I have responded to Cain here, after ignoring dozens of his insults, and I am done with this for now and for the future.


Time to move on. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Regards,
Stormbinder

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

Back to the original topic. I also hope that there will be soon more information about the nature of Norfleet's cheating, and what's more importent - some prompt fix to close that loophole. Until it is fixed, the is no quarantee that it'll not be used again(or already being used) in other MP Dom2 games, by Norfleet in disguise or anybody else, to whom he may give his "hack". It can be especially devastating to such a long and time intesive game as Dom 2, because if people feel that thay maybe wasting several days of their time because they are playing against blatant cheater, it can have sad consequences to the community (just look at Pirathium here http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif ).

However Ilwinter have my complete trust that they will find this loophole and fix it.

Regards,
Stormbinder

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

Adulation ? lol. How utterly, utterly, completely nauseating.

I'm sorry, a lot of the abuse was self inflicted, well deserved, existed before Norfleet, had nothing to do with Norfleet and will continue to exist long after Norfleet.

I have never said this before but in an offhand way, I kind of hope Caine does start a flame war, not because I like to see flame wars but shet, some kind of counter-balance...I mean, some people really need a triple strength reality check, imo...

- Kel

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

OK, perhaps a bit strong. I was trying to make the point that Caine's use of the pejorative "fanboy" doesn't make appreciation for Stombinder's efforts a negative thing.

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

lol this post has become very amusing lately... so many bickering kids

Re: So how \'bout those Mets?
 

Then please do so. Stop it. Ignore him. Don't answer his Posts. If I hear one more of your oscar speeches, I'll go rampage.
/polite rant

Didn't...want...to...reply.......can't...keep....e yes...off...thread.......made...me....say....it... .

Don't bother to reply. Please.