![]() |
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
Quote:
One thing I did notice during the testing is that as an AI opponent they seem to have a lower castle build ratio than other nations. I've tested two different mods for computer opponents and possessing some small observational ability I have deduced that JK is using a very low probability dice roll for AI castle builds that checks every AI owned province every turn. It appears that JK has assigned slightly different values for each AI opponent. The water nations appear to have the highest ratio. If you play mods as AI opponents, then they also seem to get a higher probability for castle builds. I suspect they get a default dice roll value that is greater than that of some standard nations. No real science here, just observations by a very old engineer. |
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
Sounds more like the UW nations are finding the free castle sites.
|
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
Quote:
I do know that castle cost is not a factor in AI castle building. I modded a version of "All Nations" and gave half the nations Wizards Towers for all terrains and there was not any difference in the number of castles built between the two groups over two or three long games. |
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
OOPS. I'm sorry that I pushed this a little off topic.
What I mean is that Hinnom's strength is its national troops, and as an AI opponent if they do not build additional castles the national troop build is too restricted. Too much gold is spent on indies, even using BI opponents, and the computer choices for national troop builds are not always optimal. That is why as an AI opponent they do not always perform as well as when played by a person. Not enough prime national troops and commanders. It is also the reason I limited national troop selections and removed capitol only restrictions in the Improved Computer Opponent mods. These mods are optimal if the AI nation gets some favorable "build castle" dice rolls or finds free castle sites. Otherwise they are merely slightly enhanced versions of themselves. I wonder if JK could correlate AI castle build probabilities to degree of difficulty? That would help AI nations, if it doesn't bankrupt them. (OOPS, another OT nudge.) |
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
Why has this discussion pushed into Hinnom SP? The topic was Hinnom MP, where they are unstoppable with a good player at the helm.
|
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
Shush, I'm playing Hinnom MP. Don't give them any ideas....:D
|
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
Quote:
A reminder that MP is only a part of the game so a fix needs to involve more fixing the MP part if it breaks others. |
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
how could more balancing hinnom for MP possibly break SP? I don't even understand that.
|
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
What Gandalf means, I think, is that there's an MP element to the game, and a (badly neglected) SP element, and they don't work the same way at all. I personally think we need atleast 1 version of each Nation for SP, and atleast 1 version of each Nation for MP. Probably more than one.
|
Re: No more MP for Hinnom?
Also, if on harder difficulties many people are already seeing Hinnom fumbling around in SP, then "tuning" them with even subtle nerfs intended for MP, may just compound that problem. Of course, I'm having trouble figuring out what might be different about them, that the AI underperforms even against itself. (I'd like to note, many of my recent test games, Hinnom or Ashdod take off like crazy.) I'd be willing to bet it has to do with the AI's propensity for cheap indie troops though, as Hinnom's strength is based off of their incredible national troops (and if they lag in castles, that will have the obvious effect on that).
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.