.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   MP: Gluttony - LA Game - Running (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=45866)

Nauquan September 15th, 2010 02:02 AM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
Do I have this right? You want to extend the current turn deadline 72 hours? If nobody has any objections, I will extend the deadline.

earcaraxe September 15th, 2010 09:20 AM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nauquan (Post 758100)
Do I have this right? You want to extend the current turn deadline 72 hours? If nobody has any objections, I will extend the deadline.

ok for me.

Otherling September 16th, 2010 06:32 PM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
As Agartha's turn is already in, I'm assuming that sansanjuan wanted the next turn postponed until after Monday, rather than this one. However, from the looks of things, a couple players may have been relying on a delay in this turn. I've postponed the turn for 24 hours so we can hopefully get things sorted out.

Otherling September 16th, 2010 10:07 PM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
And it appears that I was worried for nothing after all, as it looks like everyone's in on time except Ulm, who's gone. I'm gone for a little while, but I'd imagine one of the other admins can force the turn if no-one needs to resend.

sansanjuan September 20th, 2010 11:02 PM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
I'm back and turn is in. Sorry for the delay.
-ssj

Finalgenesis September 22nd, 2010 10:22 AM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
Ryleth seeks Astral gems, trading 4 W/D/N per 3 S.

Hadrian_II September 22nd, 2010 04:05 PM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
doh, somehow i forgot my army at the fort, lucky patala

Finalgenesis September 23rd, 2010 01:59 AM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
This is an annoucement that Agartha have broken its NAP 3 and initiated a surprise attack. Be warned that Sansanjuan does not keep to agreements or treaty.

Consider any present or future agreement with them to be meaningless, and that there is no need to pay mind to any treaty/agreement with one who does not keep them.

sansanjuan September 23rd, 2010 11:01 AM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Finalgenesis (Post 759013)
This is an annoucement that Agartha have broken its NAP 3 and initiated a surprise attack. Be warned that Sansanjuan does not keep to agreements or treaty.

Consider any present or future agreement with them to be meaningless, and that there is no need to pay mind to any treaty/agreement with one who does not keep them.

Let it be said that last month Agartha attacked two provinces owned by C'tis... not R'yleh. Agartha welcomes any evidence to the contrary by any party and is mightily confused by the R'yleh reaction. Perhaps R'yleh would agree to have the evidence heard by all pretenders of Gluttony and abide by their decision? Agartha still considers the R'yleh-Agartha NAP in place and will respond in kind to any aggression to the best of our meager abilities.


Let it further be stated that Agartha has turned the other cheek last year as R'yleh insulted Agartha with their harsh reviews of the "Agartha Finger Puppet Troop" calling the performance "weak" and "over the top".

Who is sansanjuan? Do you mean Ool?

-Agartha

sansanjuan September 23rd, 2010 11:54 AM

Re: Gluttony - LA Game - Running
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Finalgenesis (Post 759013)
This is an annoucement that Agartha have broken its NAP 3 and initiated a surprise attack. Be warned that Sansanjuan does not keep to agreements or treaty.

Consider any present or future agreement with them to be meaningless, and that there is no need to pay mind to any treaty/agreement with one who does not keep them.



Agartha would like to share an excerpt from the Air Queen involved with the R'yleh " misunderstanding " ..

"I had just finished off some C'tis rabble and, right in the middle of my post - battle preening, who should show up but a legion of naked, insane, R'ylehian madmen! Usually I am flattered to be pursued by a mob of naked, insane men but these seemed bent on doing me harm (!) and their hamdlers in the back were U-G-L-Y. To be honest they seemed as surprised to see me as I was to see them..."

Thuella



Assuming Thuella's account is accurate, how was the NAP violated?

Agartha Ministry of Excerpts


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.