Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

Who's ooc?

Currently, Shinuyama has a NAP with R'lyeh and you (Abysia), as far as I know.

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

by "ooc" i meant "out of character". thanks.

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

*OOC*

To make things simply I'll keep a list of any NAP below.

Jotun - Bandar Log : NAP 3

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

Yonz: Finders keepers - We don't negotiate about lands possessed independents. Care to trade my N/F/E gems to your Astrals?

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

Bandar Log - Jotun - NAP3

Bandar Log - Abysia - NAP3

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

Also, Vanhiem, you mentioned peace in your remarks about our border, but I'm not sure if you meant an NAP3 or not.

Anyway, such an agreement is on the table if you want to confirm it.

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

i keep a list in the first post too.

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

That would be a pleasure. So there is a NAP 3 Bandar Log-Vanheim. Monkeys are funny. I do not want them destroyed.

On the other side, there is not the same pact between Vanheim and Jotunheim. Lord of Jotuns have made a proposal, but it was with an agreement of war against Ulm, which is not my intention. Lord of the Giants may be interested to know that I would agree the same agreement with no war against Ulm involved in...

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

To Vanheim:

We agree to Vanheim's proposal, NAP 3, and actually our offer of peace was seperate from the war so no problems there (it was not a condition), we did mention that you may prefer to expand instead.

Re: MA game: Great Forum, game running
 

Then tread carefully since probably don't want to stumble upon one of my expansion parties. As for the gems: I'll pass that as I currently have no way of spending N F or E gems. Maybe later.