Re: Proposition 39
 

I know you don't mean Ermor, because Ermor staled...
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/mad.gif

Re: Proposition 39
 

yeah, she was never designed to take out my fellow wyrms.

Re: Proposition 39
 

All Wyrms should note that Arcoscephale has signed on to passed Proposition 39 following B'hemet's return from Holy Day celebration.

Re: Proposition 39
 

was it still open at the time? I mean do votes count after it ha s closed and passed?

Re: Proposition 39
 

Lord Pasha is happy to allow Arco to add its support to Prop 39. After all, it would make war much more interesting!! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Re: Proposition 39
 

Since Pasha is in favor, I'm inclined to let Arco slide on the time limit (due to the holiday) this time, unless somebody objects.

Re: Proposition 39
 

But ... doesn't that make fewer armies I can eat???

Re: Proposition 39
 

yes, it does. I am tempted to put something out there to make the prospect of war less confusing

Re: Proposition 39
 

It means that all Wyrms that voted in favor can attack Arco, but that those same Wyrms (including Arco's Wyrm) can counter-attack. For example, Ulm and Abysia might attack Arco. But, then Arco and T.C. can counter-attack, etc., but then Mictlan, Man and Pythium can attack T.C. for attacking Abysia and Ulm, etc.

Sounds like Vyrmin will have many, many things to eat!

Re: Proposition 39
 

so basically it very nearly degenerates the council - or rather makes the diplomatic peace insanely fragile, in regards to arco.