Re: Vanheim
 

Wokeye, do you mean Cealum instead of Vanheim?

Re: Vanheim
 

As stated, Vanheim has attacked Abysia this turn.

EDIT: I have had my correspondence minister review notes on our diplomatic discussions and would like to withdraw my previous statement regarding a NAP with Vanheim. It was discusses, but never formally agreed to.

Nevertheless, we do not appreciate the visiting vanheim raiders. Their mirror imaging confuses our citizens.

Re: Vanheim
 

Well, Vanheim is like a tricky fox. When we are fighting TC/Niefel they stay away like a peace lover. Now we have almost done then they come and want some free cakes? No neighbour can be more dangerous than them...except Cealum...

To Cealum:
Attacking us before terminate the NAP is just beyond belief. Any explanation?

To Vanheim:
We pay and we gain. Anyone wants to disturb our harvest will be punished. And, congratulation, you have NAP with Cealum. Hopefully they can tell Vanheim from Lanka...We are both in red and they never care about NAPs...

Re: Vanheim
 

Interesting stuff....hope my NAP with Caelum is worth the paper its printed on. Of course I find it easier to enforce NAPs when you are not bordering the nation that you have them with.

I returned your email wokeye.

Re: Vanheim
 

Map borders don't mean much with all those portals http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Re: Vanheim
 

That's true...my back is never safe. Not too many armies moving in the portals, unless they are sneaking past my scouts, which is possible.

Re: Vanheim
 

I'm sorry about that, I was quite certain that I cancelled the NAP in turn 17 to Lanka, I will ofc not attack any further for the next 2 rounds then..

I apologise for the attack

Re: Vanheim
 

Any reason why the server still shows its waiting for TC's turn?

Re: Agouti (Noob Team Game) Looking For Players
 

eh, holidays?

Re: Agouti (Noob Team Game) Looking For Players
 

Now it has removed TC from the list of players, so everything should be ok.