![]() |
Re: Trading commanders, exploit or not?
Quote:
The Cyclop didn't once cast Earthquake in those twenty tests. Now if you see WMD spells cast often in similar situations and I haven't, and didn't see even once in this test (with CBM 1.6 btw), then either of us has encountered a weird fluke. I wonder if others have time to run similar tests to check which one of us two has encountered the fluke. |
Re: Trading commanders, exploit or not?
Jarkko, if you're doing tests do you think you can also do it with the movement impairment issue? As in script the clops the same but have him and the warriors set to attack a prov, with the pan attacking their originating province.
|
Re: Trading commanders, exploit or not?
Quote:
However, that will have to wait for tomorrow or Monday, as I'm about to hit bed now :) |
Re: Trading commanders, exploit or not?
Quote:
I'm willing to bet that if you look at the log you will see a malus for gem cost. Basicly, the ai rates the success of various spells, and then downgrades the effectivess of the spell for the gem cost. Oh, and excessive fatigue too. |
Re: Trading commanders, exploit or not?
Heck, I would probably use the Bogus Commanders orders at this point, if I could. I have never managed to do it, nor seen anyone else do it. I think it would be a bit like a home run, if someone managed to use it effectivly
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.