.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   Evermore - MegaGame - Winner: AdmiralZhao! (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=35902)

Velusion September 17th, 2007 05:03 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
I've decided the game will now have a victory condition of holding 400 provinces for three turns.

As a reference, Perpetuality has a victory condition of the first player to hist 650 provinces wins.

I'll update the first post.

Jazzepi September 17th, 2007 05:12 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
I'm fine with the province win condition. I think that one works a lot better.

Jazzepi

tibbs September 21st, 2007 04:30 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
Province win should be good. But maybe we should set it as a percentage since you don't know how big the map will be. I really think 30% to 40% wouldn't be a bad number to shoot for.

Xietor September 21st, 2007 05:02 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
perpetuality has no victory condition.

If you have imposed one unilaterally, since you are in the game, I would suggest setting yourself to ai. I certainly will not recognize any victor in perpetuality if he achieves a victory condition imposed after the fact. Most especially one imposed by a current player who is near the lead in provinces.

Velusion September 21st, 2007 05:15 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
Quote:

Xietor said:
perpetuality has no victory condition.


Yes it does. Look at the first post.

Velusion September 21st, 2007 05:16 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
Quote:

tibbs said:
Province win should be good. But maybe we should set it as a percentage since you don't know how big the map will be. I really think 30% to 40% wouldn't be a bad number to shoot for.

It will be 40% unless we are significantly lacking in players.

Xietor September 21st, 2007 06:03 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
When was that added? I could have sword the game had zero victory conditions when the game started.

As a practical matter, if a race is a clear winner, people will concede anyway. But I am against victory conditions before a clear winner is established.

The player with 65% may not be able to win a victory over then player with 35% if they fought it out. Which makes it arbitrary.

Velusion September 21st, 2007 06:39 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
Quote:

Xietor said:
When was that added? I could have sword the game had zero victory conditions when the game started.


It's been like that since before the game started.

Xietor September 21st, 2007 08:32 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
I apologize then. My memory is failing. I cannot remember voting on victory conditions. I do remember voting against arcane nexus, utterdark and bot however.

But I was not following the thread as closely then as I have been since.

Velusion September 22nd, 2007 07:13 PM

Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
 
We are now accepting sign-ups! See the first post in this thread for details.

Nation Preferences/passwords will be due Oct 1st Noon
Pretenders will then be due on Oct 4th 9pm

Reminder: Don't sign up in this tread. See the first post for how to sign-up.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.