.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl. Complete. Wraithlord wins. (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=43958)

WraithLord December 9th, 2009 09:33 AM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
Dimaz, I now took a loot at the turn. You've got to be kidding me?- I counted on our borders something like 5 armies of yours, each led by anywhere from 2-4 kohen SCs + backup mage cadre.

Only now I realize how lucky I got on first round. To tell the truth I've no idea how to stop all these armies.
When first I realized about the NAP you signed with Midgard I was sure I made a mistake coming to his help. Now that I see some of your raw might I am sure I was barely there in time to stop you.
Also w/o Jomons help I'm toast :)

You can tell it anyway you like but these are the facts and my turns are saved so after the game is over it can all be validated.

Kuritza December 9th, 2009 09:57 AM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
Some thugs + several hundred undead + rigor mortis maybe? Hmm.... I dunno... Darkness? Ghost grip spam? I can think of a dozen ways to stop such armies as Ermor. Judging by graphs, research wont be a problem very soon. :)
Zeldor also complained that poor, weak Ermor chaff cant deal with teleporting SCs. Then, of course, it turned out that Rigor Mortis is still there, in the spellbook.

By the way, such rethorics... 'now that I see your raw might... we stopped them just in time...' - I believe it was used by every aggressor who cared about his public image over the history of mankind. :)

WraithLord December 9th, 2009 10:19 AM

So now it's both propaganda and trying to gauge how far am I from rigor mortis and darkness? ;)

Yes, thank you pointing the aggressor thing out. You caught me red handed, I was reading all this in the practical guide to the modern aggressor, it's all there in the PR chapter :D

Dimaz December 9th, 2009 10:27 AM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
Sorry guys I'm not following your very interesting discussion, I recently got some important task to do on work. As to what I wanted when posted here, well first I was almost sure that I want to turn AI and let you all have fun, I'm not so sure now. That's all.

Dimaz December 9th, 2009 12:32 PM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
About my army size, wow, and you dare to say I'm exxagerating??? I can tell you the exact count of my kohen SCs if you are so interested, and it's less than your minimal estimate. Also practice says that in the current equip they are not so useful against your hordes, right?
Anyway this 'propaganda' from both sides doesn't change anything. I just hope you have fun, because I'm not.

WraithLord December 9th, 2009 05:15 PM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
Look Dimaz. You see things from your end and I mine. I feel bad that you feel bad b/c this is not real war. It's a game and I value friendship above any given game. Now you played your cards and I mine. I think you are overpowering and you think that I am. Now we are locked in war. No amount of argument or complaints will change that.
I was having some fun until now, but knowing that a fellow player ,that I value and respect, is upset is not my idea of fun.

Honestly, what would you have me do?- Do you want me to surrender the game?- Would that make you feel any better?

Bickering over game moves is tiresome and makes me start hating the game b/c it feels more like a chore than actually fun. Oh, maybe I'll make it my last diplo game. The RAND games are so blissfully quiet.

Dimaz December 9th, 2009 05:43 PM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
Quote:

The RAND games are so blissfully quiet
Yep.
Well, I think I calmed down a bit. Now I looked in detail through my turn and see how you managed to kill/scare my thugs and I have even more concern, but in general I feel better. I don't think I'll be able to win this war, but I'll continue fighting. Maybe I'll have some fun after all, since this is the only reason to play the game in the first place.
2rdonj I now think I understand your point, and while I certainly disagree with it, you have your right to play as you wish and have fun.

Aethyr December 10th, 2009 01:51 AM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
What an intersting turn of events. Although it will most likely mean our destruction, Midgard hereby cancels its NAPs with both Ermor and Jomon.

rdonj December 10th, 2009 02:05 AM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
Given that the terms of our NAP agreement stated we were to not fight each other until either we or ermor were destroyed, I think it might be a good idea to come up with terms for when we are actually allowed to attack one another :D

Aethyr December 10th, 2009 02:27 AM

Re: Sharivar - LA game 4 bussy ppl, running
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WraithLord (Post 710472)
Diplomacy allowed.
NAP's are not considered binding.

Indeed. :D

We should come to a mutually agreed upon set of conditions.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.