![]() |
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
Quote:
|
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Have you read the IPCC reports? And not just the summary report, the whole big thing? I don't know, but I find it amusing that you are acting like some big tough 'flamewarrior' while calling everyone else who happens to disagree with the premise you support whatever names you want. Anyway, out of idle curiosity what is your background Omni? Are you involved in some field related to climatology? Quote:
Following your statements rigidly leads to a particular conclusion, true, however, I challenge that your statements are actually born out in observable evidence. |
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
congratulations licker!!! YOU WIN!
|
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
Oh, c'mon, we can't let him win! :D
For his own ammission, he didn't read a word of the scientifical souces provided. He posted only that article that was saying the opposite of what he was thinking (the scientists saying the reports of the robots was a phenomenon to study and broaden, him thinking that it was the great proof of "there is not heat" - also while I had provided articles showing that some local cooling being irrelevant). As source we have only his own word on the topic (not a graph, not an unbiased article) and his belief that thousands of adult, top-intelligent scientists lie and don't really think what they say about this vital phenomenon, because they fear the other childr... ehm the peer review :p (Not to sound rude myself too, licker, that's just random thoughts) ;) |
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
I know I win, thanks for admitting it.
Anyway, I've posted links to studies showing the temperature drops, I've discussed the findings and why omni was wrong in his assumptions about my positions. If anyone isn't reading all the information available it's clearly not me, but as omni points out so eloquently... Some people in this thread don't care about the research, they just care about flaming. Tifone- Do you really think I said any of that? Or are you just spinning to what you want to hear? I've looked at your sources and realized they were not scientific in nature, you do realize this yourself right? So there's nothing wrong with looking at them, but you shouldn't just leave it at that. Anyway as far as the robot findings are concerned, you really should read that article again, as it appears you have completely missed the point. It was not 'some local cooling' it was over 3000 robots world wide. And they didn't find (much) cooling either. Seriously what filter do you run information through when you process it? And when some one says 'not to <foo>' clearly they are fulling intending to <foo>. That's ok, like I said, I can keep it seperate from the game (since we're still on the dominions forum) and I don't mind a provocative discussion, I just find it amusing to see you and omni doing exactly what you are accusing me and others of. Hypocrite much? Well maybe that's not fair, maybe you and omni just don't have the backgrounds to understand what this debate is really about. I don't know and I don't really care. But if you aren't actually going to show evidence for your claims about what you imagined I said then I'm not going to bother to take your interpretations of some blogs seriously. And if that sounds rude it probably is. |
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
Quote:
Oops, I killed the thread. :) -Max |
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
|
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
Yes, I couldn't resist.
|
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
I've been reading this thread for the last hour when I should have been studying. I blame you all for that, however It was interesting reading your arguments about GW.
|
Re: Someone cast Wolven Winter on New Orleans!
For the past 48h I've been on the edge of my seat waiting for Godwin. :P What an epic name.
Anyway, kudos all. I am amazed that you can stare analysis in the face that show that the Earth is warmer than it has been in a thousand(s) years, probably since the last ice age, but we can't accurately verify that..... yet still you continue to bicker about scientific process, and the apparent "trend" of the last several years. Once a scientist has defined "2", even a layperson can add it to itself, if just stop arguing for long enough. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.