Re: Bifrons up for grabs
 

Now that's just mean. ;P As if magic dueling poor Bifrons wasn't mean enough.

Unfortunately I get the feeling you may be opening up some more slots on my roster before I'm done with you. Still, anybody trying to snatch my devils should know I'll be immediately resummoning any that fall so there's a decent chance your blood slaves will be wasted.

1500 posts
 

1500 posts. 101 pages. A new milestone? Someone should write a book about this game. Although sadly, poor LA Pangaea would probably only get a mention in the appendix.

Re: 1500 posts
 

Server of the game down ?

I just get quicked from it and no way to reconnect.

Stelteck, LA abysia

Re: 1500 posts
 

Service seems restored.

Stelteck, the flamming people.

Re: 1500 posts
 

Hmm, even though I got no stale turn message, my orders from last turn didn't seem to get processed. Oh well, I guess it didn't work out so bad anyway.

Re: 1500 posts
 

A book or a novel about this game seems a good idea. A kind of wiki-based online novel where everyone write his own history.

Re: 1500 posts
 

Pfaugh! History is written by *the winners*. Whoever wins the game gets to write whatever glaringly self-serving, factually inaccurate history they want.

Re: 1500 posts
 

There is a history of perpetuality thread, where you can write down your history.

Question about subs for this game
 

I'd like to make a proposal regarding subs for this game. As we climb towards late game and it looks like things are just getting warmed up I thought we might address the question of how to handle temporary subs for nations in good positions. This came up with LA R'yleh, and it looks like Machaka is having trouble finding a sub. Specifically I'd like to propose that we allow subs who are already in the game. I believe the thinking behind banning one person from playing two nations was to stop somebody from essentially having a double sized empire. However, in the case of a temporary sub, particularly as we hit the late game and alliances are formed I think it makes more sense to allow someone to let their ally (or whoever they choose) play their nation temporarily. Nobody wants nations in strong positions to be forced to stale (particularly if it's your ally!), and I don't really see this giving anyone an advantage as the nations will (presumably) be working in concert anyway.

Re: Question about subs for this game
 

I didn't think that was possible -- I think the game itself won't let you play more than one side in a hosted MP game. Is this true?