Re: Stalings et al.
 

Thank you for your concern! I even reconsidered travelling to T'ien C'hi to keep Soapy company; It would do my arm no good to overtax it now! Or was it leg? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Re: Stalings et al.
 

Server is down again this morning http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/frown.gif

Re: Stalings et al.
 

Restarted!

(Due to limbo having some problems with his connection, I fill in... Bribes accepted, of course! Mmmm... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image.../beerglass.gif or [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Martini.gif[/img] or perhaps even [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Woman3.gif[/img] and [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Woman4.gif[/img]...)

Re: Stalings et al.
 

Anyone? I don't have a clue...

I guess I'll post a sub-search anyway, what's to stop the sub from playing with the masterkey anyways?

Re: Stalings et al.
 

I've got a possible replacement. It's an old friend, who is fairly new at Dominions. The fact that I know him shouldn't pose any problems as he usually does what he thinks best - not what I tell him.

If we agree to take him in as the new God og Ulm, I'll have him post here, and bring him up to speed on the game so far.

Re: Stalings et al.
 

I say that's just perfect. Anyone have an objection, be quick about it.

I have set the game to quickhost only, so that he can have the time necessary to acclimate himself.

Re: Stalings et al.
 

i boarder ulm and am a war with man (Knudsen)
it would be like i am fighting the same guy on both sides.
just let him go ai and be done with it.
it would be the fairest for those who boarder ulm.

Re: Stalings et al.
 

amendment
on new ulm
if the new ulm would agree not to attack ermor and/or if "man" was fighting a two side war this would work.
but i vote AI.

Re: Stalings et al.
 

i say, let knudsens friend fill in as ulm. ulm has enough problems with ai pangae and indys. and if ulm would be ai also, then it would be way to easy for ermor to conquer dem northern lands. can we make non-agression-agreedment between new-ulm and ermor for a 15 turns? would that be ok for rex_havok?

Re: Stalings et al.
 

I'd say let Ulm make decisions for himself... He is not Knudsen (right? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif), so it is not a given that he'll be attacking Ermor or anyone else... Although he does have only two neighbors and a substantial amount of gold and gems that have accumulated with his stales http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif