.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Dominions 3: The Awakening (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=138)
-   -   Bug: Bug Thread: Discussion (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=30593)

Edi March 7th, 2008 03:24 PM

Re: Description trivialities
 
Fixed locmask issues updated to the shortlist.

fantasma March 7th, 2008 05:00 PM

fortress
 
A while ago (3.10, I think) it happened that I built a fortress the same time I discovered a magic site that gives a fortress (I think Kelp fortress). That was as EA Oceania, sea province.
This resulted in no fortress and until the usual time was spent to construct it. I'm not sure of what the intended behaviour should be. It seems strange that a site you discover loses its effect.

I haven't had registered then to post it immediately. Since this is a pretty rare coincidence, I'm not sure if this is a known issue.

Edi March 7th, 2008 05:25 PM

Re: fortress
 
It's not a known issue, thanks for reporting it.

I suppose one way to test this kind of mechanics would be to cast a spell like Three Red Seconds or Wizard's Tower on a province where a commander is building a fort. It's not exactly the same thing, but it's similar.

Agrajag March 8th, 2008 04:52 AM

Re: fortress
 
Or just put one of those sites in a map and test from that.

Edi March 8th, 2008 05:20 AM

Re: fortress
 
Why didn't I think of that? That's what I get for posting at 1 am after tinkering with the DB all day, not thinking straight anymore...

Sombre March 9th, 2008 07:55 AM

Re: fortress
 
Spells/Behaviour: Legions of Steel the spell is still being cast on units with no armour. In fact it seems to happen more often now than before, with no armour casters basically casting it on themselves rather than nearby troops.

Kristoffer O March 9th, 2008 10:22 AM

Re: fortress
 
Strange. Might be a negative number or something. IIRC I made it less likely to be cast on casters. A negative would increase the chance instead.

vfb March 9th, 2008 07:35 PM

Re: Failure to move
 
Sometimes armies refuse to move when they are given orders to do so. No events or battles or rituals affected the province when the bug occurred.

Here is a thread where this bug is being discussed:

http://www.shrapnelcommunity.com/thr...?Number=586100

Other threads have also mentioned this problem.

I have sent my .trn and .2h files to the developers.

ano March 9th, 2008 08:56 PM

Re: Failure to move
 
Found a nice bug recently.
If you order a mage to forge something and then give him a slave collar, he will still do his task. I understand this can be explained with "he forged that item before becoming feebleminded" but feeblemind is instantaneous and forging is not.

lch March 9th, 2008 09:33 PM

Re: Failure to move
 
Quote:

ano said:
Found a nice bug recently.
If you order a mage to forge something and then give him a slave collar, he will still do his task. I understand this can be explained with "he forged that item before becoming feebleminded" but feeblemind is instantaneous and forging is not.

The game carries out orders given in the previous turn regardless of what happened, as long as that unit is still alive in the next turn. Removing an item from a unit usually resets their orders, especially if it has to do with casting or forging. Other orders (like research) might not reset that fast. But giving an item to a unit doesn't change the orders given at all.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.