![]() |
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
Looks like player on player violence has already started - anyone care to report on the details? Surely someone has something to brag about, right? Enquiring minds want to know...
|
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
It could also be a misfortune event that caused arco to lose a province. But going by the graphs...Ulm, Mictlan, and Jotum all gained a province the same time Arco lost his.
And it looks like Ulm is going to invade me also. |
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
only ulms turn left for it to host
|
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
Unfortunately Arco and I (Jotum) started side by each so I have been going at him out of desperation
|
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
Quote:
Quote:
Ermor is a special consideration due to its destructive dominion and I attacked that indy province to lay claim to it in order to prevent Ermor from taking it and building a temple/fort in it. I won't attack any provinces already owned by Ermor, and the 3 turns treaty offer extends to Ermor as well. Also, if we attack the same indie province, it belongs to however wins the battle that ensues. I'd take that as an accident and won't affect any treaty if one exists. |
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
I would like one of those treaties.
|
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
Quote:
|
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
I'm so happy no one borders me.. yet. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif
|
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
Quote:
How do these usually work? Is it: Turn 1: Declaration of hostile intent. Turn 2: No hostile action. Turn 3: Issue orders for hostile action. |
Re: MP Game - Pandemonium (noob/int game) - open
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.