.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   MP: Rothfuss- Running (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=42004)

zzcat February 15th, 2009 03:23 AM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Burnsaber (Post 674364)
Also, T'ien C'hi would like to declare that we are very intrested in trading for Air boosters and Fire boosters. We have gems of all types and are able to forge many items due to our mages being very crosspathy.

Ashdod want to trade for air boosters too. Please PM me if anyone has interest in it:)

Juffos February 21st, 2009 07:03 PM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
Ashdod made their move towards world domination and struck the nation of Eriu with teleporting artifact-fitted Adonim. They are leading the gem production and research graphs and will soon lead in provinces too.

Like I previously said, unless this threat is met by a united front, the world will burn in hellish flames.

Short: the goddamn Ashdod is trying to run away with the game and are you going to let him do so?

http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=41391

Incabulos February 21st, 2009 07:28 PM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
The nation of Arcoscephale hereby gives notice that we are dissolving our NAP with Ashdod and hostilities may commence 3 turns hence.

zzcat February 22nd, 2009 05:07 AM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
Hmm... It's really strange for me that Arcoscephale should turn to me when Gift of Nature's Bounty has been risen. If we left Eriu undisturbed with 4500+ income per turn, we are all doomed. IMO a crusade against Eriu is most reasonable choice for all nations who border Eriu. But see what happens? We are fighting each other and weakening ourselves when Eriu becomes stronger and stronger???

With the NAP cancelled. I think we can attack each other at turn 42? So let's prepare for a big war:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Incabulos (Post 675943)
The nation of Arcoscephale hereby gives notice that we are dissolving our NAP with Ashdod and hostilities may commence 3 turns hence.


Juffos February 22nd, 2009 07:50 AM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
Yes, I am going to annihilate you all with my endless supply of slingers. Too bad I lack the artifacts, recruitable supercombatants, research, magical diversity and late game power of Ashdod.

Ashdod trying to convince the world of Eriu's dangerousness... :)

Incabulos February 22nd, 2009 11:47 AM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zzcat (Post 676016)
Hmm... It's really strange for me that Arcoscephale should turn to me when Gift of Nature's Bounty has been risen. If we left Eriu undisturbed with 4500+ income per turn, we are all doomed. IMO a crusade against Eriu is most reasonable choice for all nations who border Eriu. But see what happens? We are fighting each other and weakening ourselves when Eriu becomes stronger and stronger???

With the NAP cancelled. I think we can attack each other at turn 42? So let's prepare for a big war:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Incabulos (Post 675943)
The nation of Arcoscephale hereby gives notice that we are dissolving our NAP with Ashdod and hostilities may commence 3 turns hence.


turn 41 by my count since I posted before submitting the previous turn, should have sent an in game message to make the timing clear but the whole NAP is still quite a new concept to me.

and since I have watched your research spike, your gem income go through the roof and seen your sc/thugs in action I am pretty sure you are the greater threat.

If you think it should be tuurn 32 that is fine by me too. Just let me know here.

zzcat February 22nd, 2009 10:19 PM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
I have little MP experience too so I don't know if there is any common rule to judge the case:(

Anyway, it's not a big matter, turn 41 is OK with me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Incabulos (Post 676056)
turn 41 by my count since I posted before submitting the previous turn, should have sent an in game message to make the timing clear but the whole NAP is still quite a new concept to me.

and since I have watched your research spike, your gem income go through the roof and seen your sc/thugs in action I am pretty sure you are the greater threat.

If you think it should be tuurn 32 that is fine by me too. Just let me know here.


NKIcan February 23rd, 2009 10:26 PM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
Just to let you know: Pythium has attacked without warning and broke the NAP without notice that we had with it.

I think he really overestimates what he can do, given the makeup of his forces. Still, let all be aware not to make deals with him.

If any opponent of Pythiums would like some support, let me know and I'll send you a ton o' gems and items that I have in excess.

Redeyes February 24th, 2009 05:31 AM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
There was no nap ^
In fact, you could call me... at war with everyone.
Pythium the Napless, who has no naps.

Burnsaber February 26th, 2009 12:07 AM

Re: Rothfuss- Running
 
Okay guys, I'm going to my sister's wedding and once this turn is hosted, the game will be on hold until monday.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.