Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

This is one of my favorite mods--it is played alot and enjoyed immensely. There have been alot of Posts--and I am sure you have recieve tons of emails--dont get discouraged-- just do the best you can. I personally dont expect perfection--or ultra Canon in this mod. SE-IV has its drawbacks/ limitations as well--. I do thank you for bringing this mod to the public--and its a winner. I really need to get into a PBW once my shedule is a bit more relaxed.

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Whoa Atrocities. Sounds as if you need a couple of days off. Just press the shut down option and STEP AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER.

Take a couple of days, or even a week, off. Leave this thing alone and try not to think about it.

You've done a marvelous job on this - so much so that if I spent any more time with it I swear my wife will divorce me. I actually go through withdrawals of a sort when I can't play.

This has become my all-time favorite game. Any improvements are welcome, but not at the expense of the guy doing the work on it!

Just think; Warm water, a sandy beach, palm trees, bikini clad nymphs bouncing about, palm trees, bikinis, sun tanned, shapely, bikini clad women ( did I mention bikini clad women here?). In other words; TAKE A VACATION MAN!!!

Come back to us when your head is clear. We'll be here.

JR

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

Bikini clad women? Heck, go to France or almost anywhere else in Europe when it's a little warmer, and just watch the bikini bottomed women, since going topless isn't such a big thing over there. I wouldn't mind going myself, but I think the missus would object. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">when it comes to a mod of something, there'll always be nitpickers who don't think it's canon enough. there welcome to there opinions, but unless they volunteer to do some of the work, i'd feel free to ignore them if it sounded like to much work.

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I find this particularly funny with Trek fans since so many Trek episodes are non-cannon. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif (you know like Archer meeting the Borg and Ferengi or all of a sudden Zefram didn't really invent the warp drive) (Trek nuts could argue how these things are 'cannon' and fit into the show but they'd be wrong)

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

the 'enterprise' show should be bashed over the head with large rocks.

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

Due to my son not wanting to go to bed at 8:00, I keep missing the episodes, even the repeats on Saturday nights. This is one series I'm seriously thinking about buying when it comes out on dvd. May have to put it on layaway, but I'm so completely lost that when I do catch an episode, I have no idea what's going on.

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

I think you would be just as lost watching every episode... it is not a very good series.

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">That's the impression I keep getting from the Posts I read. But I'd still like to see them for myself. There were a couple of good ones I've seen, but the episodes are too short. The TOS episodes were 51 minutes. I think Enterprise is somewhere between 35-40 minutes? I've forgotten. But it's enough to be noticed that there's not enough plot going on.

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

it's not so much that the episode's are badly written, which there not, Last time i looked, which was a while ago, as that there is no respect for continueity.