![]() |
Re: Are we paying more for less?
I would prefer to have you here. I think and hope that you opinions on the game are valuable to us and other players.
|
Re: Are we paying more for less?
I'd think that the bigger obstacle to expanding the market is that the target audience is, frankly, quite small. The number of people willing to invest the time and attention necessary to enjoy games of this nature is far, far smaller than the market for more familiar, intuitive, prettier, or shorter instant-gratification games.
You wouldn't expect World in Flames, Advanced Squad Leader or Combat Mission to sell like hotcakes if priced at $10, either. Few people would play them, even if they were free, because it takes a fairly rare bird to enjoy them. For their audience they're quite good, but that audience is small. |
Re: Are we paying more for less?
Quote:
After playing Dominions 2, I'd be surprised if I got less than 55 hours of Dom3 goodness (and I expect much much more, but this number is obviously for example purposes). For 55 hours of goodness I pay 55$, so that's 1$ for an hour of entertainment, which is much better than paying 5$ for two hours of fun at the movies, or I-don't-know-how-much-but-I-bet-its-more-than-one-dollar dollars for one hour of fun with a prostitute, and yet lots of people do both of those :O As for Dominions3 VS. other computer games, I think Dominions3 wins by far on the time spent enjoying yourself per dollar scale, there's just so much content to explore that I'd expect several times the time playing Dominions3 than other full priced games (especially EA stuff http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/tongue.gif). Quote:
Quote:
1) As I understand it, there was some complaint regarding the Dom2 manual for not being that good, so an improved manual should make those complainers happier. 2) Dominions is a very complex game, and as such, it needs a thorough manual. 3) The manual is the only difference between a legal copy, and an illegaly obtained copy. 4) Manuals are cool. Quote:
|
Re: Are we paying more for less?
Yeah, it's just the Dominion. Ctulhu ftaghn and so on.
|
Re: Are we paying more for less?
|
Re: Are we paying more for less?
Quote:
|
Re: Are we paying more for less?
OK, I obviously have 18 hours working day like Shrapnel today. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif
Listen, let's calm down - I don't want that this become unobjective harrasment of fanboys toward me or anybody who says his opinion. I already have seen this kind of behaviour at Paradox Entertainent boards and Matrix boards. We can tell all our opinion in a civilized way - and hell I don't have intention to argue with hudreds of angry fans http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif( First, I own web shop for selling PC & video games etc... Also I was game journalist for more than ten years, I know all big faces of games industry. No, I am not boasting but my knowledge of game industry is very big. Dominions 3 is not the game like World of Warctaft for example. I bought some quantities of WoW for selling on my web shop and suddenly Blizzard have lowered the prices of that game so now I am selling this game at 0 profit lol. So, I am not arguing LOWERING prices of the games now just for the sake of arguing. Dominions 3 is different game than most of retail games and D3 price once set will not go down like Quake 4 etc... Why I pulled Heroes 5 out? Believe it or not that is main competitor now to Dominions 3!It's TBS, and fantasy. Heroes 5 have some diffenence to Dom 3 - it's big mainstream title but that don't nececary means that it is bad. Quite contrary, Nival, Russian dev., have pulled excellent job, game is even selling with nVidia 7900 cards bundled, graphics is gorgeus and gameplay is excellent. Now, due to it's nature HOMM 5 is quite expensive game - first Ubi Soft payed 1.3 MILLION US$ just to get rights for now defunct 3DO (ok for whole M&M universe), then game alone costed VERY, VERY MUCH to produce, I think 5-10 million $, marketing and PR cost were also high. Now what this have to do with Dominions 3 you may ask? Well, as much as you can argue that Dom 3 is artistic, niche, mumbo jumbo, indie game, small budget, less copies expected to sell etc... BUT! Again, for me it is quite ridiculous and slap in the face of the fans (at least those who can rationally asses this situation) to price this game at 55 $. Suggestet retail price for HOMM5 is 49.95 $. Many web sites are selling HOMM5 for 40 $ or even as low as 30$!. Now, if you had set price for Dominion 3 to 49.95 $ same like HOMM 5 that is even then higher than HOMM 5 as retail outlets and web shops will have relatively smaller prices on HOMM5. All, arguing that Shrapnel knows best what price to put, OK, I can agree with that, but that don't means that I must comply with that reasoning and yes I have bought the game but certanly will not do that again if Shrapnel again decide to slap mi in the face. Even my opinion is here not important - it's important how you treat your fans. I am not attacking Shrapnel and this is quite honest my approach to them so I politely ask that fans cool down and that they don't need to defend Shrapnel. I didn't attacked them, I just have expressed my opinion on this. So, fans cool down please. I have no objections to pay even 99$ for NEW ORIGINAL DESIGN AND NEW GRAPHICS ETC:.. Of course nobody will charge that much but I have gladly payed 65 $ for Distant Guns game from SES. It is about Russo Japanese war and game that fits my term - niche within a niche. Developers have made a game about obscure war, very brave move, they didn't followed usssual approach Normandy - Bulge - Market Garden that many wargaming companies do. Dominions 3 is SEQUEL, it is great game I am sure but it is a sequel. Even manual is not excuse to price it at 55$. Now, you can all disagree with me, I have getting used to Usenet and have thick skin in that regard and I will stick with my opinion. I will play the game but bitter taste will remain. But, I will certanly not put my head in the sand and applaud any move that I don't feel it is right. Sorry just cannot do that. Regards to everyone and no hard feelings ok. Mario |
Re: Are we paying more for less?
Quote:
I bought that game. I've played it for like 2 weeks only, because it was boring for me. I've never found Doms 2. boring. Interesting isn't it? You cannot compare games, because well all have our subjective opinions [and own experience] about them. |
Re: Are we paying more for less?
A three star new user speaking for all the fans who preordered? LOL. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif
And you can't really use the "IT'S A SEQUEL" argument either since every game of the Dominions series has been better than the last one. Admit it, you just don't want to pay some extra money for it. What's the differnece of price between $40 and €55? The price of couple beer bottles? Some food? Couple miles worth of gas for the car? It's a minimalistic difference! I and a massive number of people who ordered and preordered the game think that the game is well worth it's price as it is. Illwinter made this game while their two member team worked on other jobs. I think the other dev had to even find a new job. They are teachers, which is a taxing job in itself. They made the game in their spare time and had to deal with anxious fans. I suppose the fans were anxious for a reason, afterall the game got delayed almost a year. I doubt Shrapnel is swimming in money either, and that their pricing policy is driven not only by economic realities but also selling out their games at higher price than $5 which seems that many people are ready to pay for. You seem to think of Shrapnel as some faceless monstrosite which is keeping Illwinter under some jackboot of oppression, or maybe you don't even think of the devs, or the publisher or anything else than just getting the game cheap. Thing is, we have a two man team who has made a quality came on their spare time, and you come and essenitally say that they don't deserve what's their part of the $55 the game costs? |
Re: Are we paying more for less?
Intiate self-deprecating yet vaguely insulting irony:
Its really hard to applaud with your face in the sand. Perhaps the enlightened ones with their faces turned from the earth to the heavens would care to share wisdom with us baseborn mortals? I referance the following quotations: 1)"I have no objections to pay even 99$ for NEW ORIGINAL DESIGN AND NEW GRAPHICS ETC:." How many games have had a new design? Heroes FIVE? Civ FOUR? Warcraft THREE? Dominions TWO? This is the era of the sequel, whether you like it or not. 2) "Now, if you had set price for Dominion 3 to 49.95 $ same like HOMM 5 that is even then higher than HOMM 5 as retail outlets and web shops will have relatively smaller prices on HOMM5." True enough. Dominions is also a better game. And, oddly enough, more original. 3) "Now what this have to do with Dominions 3 you may ask?" I may ask it indeed. What does anything here posted have to do with this specific game? is it not a commentary on human falibility and dissatisfaction, shot through with oblique referances to a failing industry? 4 "I already have seen this kind of behaviour at Paradox Entertainent boards and Matrix boards. We can tell all our opinion in a civilized way" My opinon, which I am entitled to hold and express according to the constitution of my nation and the rights accorded by the UN, is that the mass abuse of fans is just punishment for anyone that posts a thread like this in the dominons forums. I hold up before the jury as evidence the numerous insinuations and outright condescension exhibited in previous posts. 5) "Dominions 3 is SEQUEL, it is great game I am sure but it is a sequel. Even manual is not excuse to price it at 55$." I reiterate the above: everything is a sequel. There is no such thig as an original anymore. I dig my pit in the sand and ensconce my head firmly. /irony I hope you appreciate that that was a rather ill-concieved joke. You are fully free to express opinions, but doing so on this forum is tantamont to suicide. Much as I hate to be accused of hampering open debate, I submit that the above post was not entirely uncalled for, but that circumstances will compell others to mock it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.