Re: Blood Red FIGHT ON!)
 

So, we are all in agreement that Baalz has won, yes?

Re: Blood Red FIGHT ON!)
 

I am, at least.

Re: Blood Red FIGHT ON!)
 

I was of that opinion a long time ago already :)

Re: Blood Red FIGHT ON!)
 

I wasn't ready to quit. Oh well , if Baalz is going to be a dick, there isn't anything I can do

Re: Blood Red FIGHT ON!)
 

Who's being a dick? Literally everyone but you acknowledges that baalz has the game in the bag, but you just can't stand to give up playing with your dolls. Were this following the victory conditions of most games, it would've been over already. Baalz did not force people to declare him the winner, he simply provided arguments and evidence to support their doing so. How this makes him a "dick" is beyond me.

Re: Blood Red FIGHT ON!)
 

Because I was still having fun. If he wasn't having fun, he should have gotten a sub.

I spend 40 turns preparing an army to fight him, then he refuses to fight me and ends the game.

Re: Blood Red FIGHT ON!)
 

Near as I could tell, you spent 40 turns turtling and I won the game by ignoring you. I'm sorry that you feel cheated, but you were having fun because you were one tenth my size with one tenth of my research and one twentieth of the fights I had each turn with a similarly lopsided micro and time requirement. I get the feeling nobody else was having fun because the fights were one sided and there was no hope of things getting better....I had won the game. You still having fun does not obligate me to play a sandbox game with you where nobody is playing for a win but just goofing around to see how expensive you can make storming castles. If you had been credibly attacking me - or had any reasonable expectation of ever doing so things would have been different, but go play single player if you just want to goof around without playing for a win - don't expect me to play a tedious, pointless game nor sucker a sub into doing it.