Re: "Real" ringworlds
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm telling ya, he gotta be cheating somehow.
Come on Fyron, tell us your trick!!
I promise you ti's not gonna getta outta herear. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

.

.
Edit: He got 6008 already!!!

[ May 23, 2003, 22:00: Message edited by: Aloofi ]

Re: "Real" ringworlds
 

i read your Posts. i didn't see anything that required an extended responce. i was simply justifeing my opinion as 'that's how it works for me'. if we have a converstation where you use your definition, i will be able to take it into account and respond. and i am not going to argue over the definition of faith any more.

oh, yeah, any lack of posting today is due to bad alergies and a lack of sleep.

[ May 24, 2003, 04:54: Message edited by: narf poit chez BOOM ]

Re: "Real" ringworlds
 

So basically, you can't be wrong. Spiffy. No amount of explanation I can give will convince you that you are wrong (ie: not entirely correct, not just plain wrong), and that is not a good thing.

Re: "Real" ringworlds
 

i havn't seen anything to make me change my mind, and i don't want to have an extended arguement over a definition.

Re: "Real" ringworlds
 

Your loss.