![]() |
Re: Is this gamey?
Quote:
The only tangible benefit worth mentioning really is the extra research queue. And that I believe is not that significant. By the time this shell game is likely to be attempted the game will ahve reached the point where an empire doing research soley with research points recieved in trade is going to slow the alliance down as much as help it. The only time I would call it gamey is if the game has some sort of specific victory conditions having to do with that player being eliminated, like the Survivor tournament or the Paranoia game. Other then that it's really not a issue for me. So the player is still alive in the game, they aren't a factor in the game anymore. Move on to bigger fish. Geoschmo |
Re: Is this gamey?
Quote:
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Assuming the player is keeping all those resources for himself then you are quite correct. What if, however, he is gifting resources back to the player who gifted the planet? |
Re: Is this gamey?
Quote:
I have no trouble whatsoever with players helping each other out in games. But when one is doing so to the absolute exclusion of his own empire and getting nothing in return, as in this case of gifting away all his trade income instead of using it to rebuild his empire, then that isn't gamey. It's cheating. Geoschmo [ July 25, 2003, 13:51: Message edited by: geoschmo ] |
Re: Is this gamey?
Well, actually, assuming research has been passed, it doesn't even have to stop at gifting back the resources...the person could build a ship at his shipyard and gift a built ship. Even better.
|
Re: Is this gamey?
Well, I still don't think the gifting of the planet itself is a problem. I think it all comes down to what the intent behind the gifting of the planet is. If it is to get around some victory condition that depends on a players elimination then obviously it is wrong. If it is to make possible some convoluted scheme to gain for the gifting player additional resources, research, ships, etc. out of ether then I think it is also clearly wrong.
If on the other hand it's merely a way to keep a friend in the game and he intends to try and legitmatly rebuild his empire, or if it's a matter of saving a weaker empire and maybe having them become a useful ally later in the game (The fable of the mouse and the lion anyone? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif ) AND it is not expresslly forbidden in the pre-game conditions I would not have a problem with it. Geoschmo [ July 25, 2003, 14:29: Message edited by: geoschmo ] |
Re: Is this gamey?
Geo said it first, (and better) but since I prepared it:
Seems like it comes down to Intent Execution If the recieving player keeps and uses the resources then it seems fair. Yes they can using the Trade Resources create a ship every two to four turns. If this were a specialty ship such as a warp opener / star buster / mine sweeper / cloked spy ship etc… it could have a impact on the game. Perhaps the two sides need to reach an agreement on what the recieving player can and cannot do. Some items for consideration are: Intel Research Specialty Ships |
Re: Is this gamey?
As pointed out earlier, the benefits of this move may be overestimated. The bonus produced by the arrangement is a drop in the ocean, and the empire giving the planet has foregone a chunk of resources.
It may be frustrating for you, but it is not gamey. I have seen this move many times, and mostly, I think that it is to keep a player in the game so they can continue to have some kind of impact for a bit. For all intent and puropse, they aren't able to really do much with one planet, so it does not bother me at all. Their expansion will be at the cost of their allies. There is only so much space in the quadrant, and you have made progress in a forward direction. |
Re: Is this gamey?
Quote:
|
Re: Is this gamey?
Quote:
|
Re: Is this gamey?
Quote:
If I don't asked about questions like this, then, my opinion is that will be forced to accept anything... For things like this, was discussed before, if would be good to have some standard "house rules" to play in PBW or not... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.