Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

I agree with Thermo - the warhead is only one part of the equation, you need the means to deliver it. But if you are a third-rate country and paranoid enough, you can plant the devices at the most likely points of invasion to detonate them under an invading army.

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

Here is an interesting Side note..as you can see by my Signature I am in the USMC. I also happen to be assigned at the moment to USCENTCOM (2 years now). The point of me saying this is that although we dont trust the French enough to let them in our building unescorted (only the Brits, Aussies, and Kiwis are really allowed free reign) I have had many a talk with French Military Officers. Generally speaking the French Military is VERY dissatisfied with their Governments Policies on just about everything. The French Military is for the most step in step with the US view on "Things"

By the way..dont take this as French Bashing..just as an informative bit f observation.

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Not even the spanish ?

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Current french position on international matters are not only plainly stupid but dangerous. Don't take me wrong, I still think US policy will create more terrorism than they will root out, but there was less nocive way to say "bad idea" (As Canada did).

As a side note, you'll notice that it has always been the gaullists (say republican in USA) that were american basher (getting out of nato, saying "get lost" to bush....) and the socialists (translate as the democrats) that were pro US (Mitterand, a socialist president supporting Reagan to put pershing in Europe).

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">There has been none in this board, and it is indeed a credit to put on all members.

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Not even your friendly Canadian neighbors to the north??

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

Don't see why not. There are Canadians inside Cheyeanne Mt. NORAD base. I wonder if they get a beer break?

Does anyone know if there is still a RAF detachment in Omaha? I saw some Vulcan Bombers back in the late 80's while on a road trip through.

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

Sorry I forgot about the Canucks! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/rolleyes.gif

As for the Spanish....Im sure they have someone here...but never see them...but nope only ones given free access..(By that I mean they get to walk the halls Un-Escorted and eat in the cafeteria) Are the Brits, Ausssies, Kiwis, and Canucks. Dont get me wrong now..at the General or Admiral Level they are pretty much Un-Escorted except at that level they are escorted everywhere by there own Aids and our Aids..if you get my Drift.

AS you can imagine there are areas where NO-ONE is allowed...even us...come to think of it...hardly ever see anyone going in these areas..and NEVER see them come out!! Hmmm..just WHAT is on the other side of that door? Warp Point? Man Eating Crocigators? Twins?

I Like Twins! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Oh yeah..someone rate me..I'm desperate for attention cause we didnt have any Monkey Butlers growing up http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

oh, behind that door? it's.urk

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

every body should loose their nuclear devices but at the same time make a pact that if any country starts to make nuclear weapons, they would go in together and just destroy the facilities. That way nobody needs nukes to deter anybody else. ut this is probably an utopia

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

might work.

Re: France rethinks nuclear deterrent
 

But then you get to the point where one country says, 'destroy your nukes first' and the other replies, 'no, you destroy yours first'.