Re: Lazy non-newbie questions..
 

A very interesting idea, Rex. I'm hoping we'll find out how it works out for you.

However, doesn't the Optimal Range movement system work the same regardless of the total range of the weapon?

I thought it worked off the to-hit percentages, which would be the same for both the DUC and the long-range-of-questionable-use APB.

Re: Lazy non-newbie questions..
 

I think you are onto a good idea there Rex. While the PPB and APB are better on paper, battles aren't usually fought on paper. By sticking to DUC V's and concentrating on other areas, sensors, training, building a whole lot of ships and putting them where your enemy ain't http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif , etc., you can probably do as well or better then the other guy. If nothing else you eliminate the hassle of upgrading all your ships. That always seems to bite me in the butt. The war always seems to start about 3 turns before I planned and I don't have all my ships retrofitted and ready for battle. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Re: Lazy non-newbie questions..
 

I still think meson bLasters can be usefull. Research cost is low, they are rather cheep and at highest level are better than DUCs.

Re: Lazy non-newbie questions..
 

The problem with that analysis is that APBs do not fire at those long ranges unless you use Max Range strategy. Even Optimal Range has them firing at closer ranges most of the time. Use Point Blank and you will not have a problem with to hit ratios. In fact, with fleet stacking (in larger battles), you will see even more hits from the APB ships because more ships in the back can fire their weapons due to the long range, so you get more ships able to fire in a round than you would with short ranged weapons. Those long range shots will have low to hit ratios, but 10% (which is drastically lower than real values) is still a lot better than 0%.