Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

Well, just as I expected, I can't play the current turn due to it having been generated in v1.84.

I guess this means I'm out of this game, oh well, it was fun while it Lasted.

I hope the people remaining in the game don't run into the same problem as me. But in any case, I hope my demise due to incompatible Version numbers doesn't kill the fun for the three remaining players.

Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Why would missing one turn put you out of the game? The AI can play this one for you and then you can take back over.

If you think the AI is gonna destroy your empire in one turn, then get someone else to play it for you.

Or for that matter, reinstall 1.84 on your pc and play the turn.

Geoschmo

[ February 28, 2004, 19:28: Message edited by: geoschmo ]

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">hmmm, get someone to play my turn, good idea thanks. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif

Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

Ok, I found a good natured, good willed gentelman to process and upload my turn. (thank you very much kind Sir.)

So now I'm gonna have to insist that the host upgrade to v1.91 for the next turn.

nuf said, Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

I will email Geo now.

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

Don't mind me, I'm on a mission..

Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

P.S. The game is running smoothly again, thanks Geo.

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

Ok, I just got the news that a player has dropped out of the game. SO what are we going to do?

1) Continue without him?
2) Wait for a Replacement Player?
3) Dissolve the game and find/start new ones to join?

Personally I think that whatever you decide is fine with me. I'm enjoying a ton of SE5 work right now anyway so I probably won't notice the difference. I only play the turns when I get notified by e-mail anyway. (which is usually first thing in the mornings.)

Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

P.S. If you decide to abandon the game, perhaps we could share our passwords so that we can take a look at how each player was doing in the game. It's just a thought.

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

Ok, I can understand the game being removed due to too many players having left, but I still have one question,..

Was there a Winner?

Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

[ March 19, 2004, 20:00: Message edited by: David E. Gervais ]

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

Sorry, My fault. I sometimes fail to get my feelings accross in my Posts. It was not my intent to bash PBW, it is an excellent tool to facilitate the playing of PBW games. In fact I would not have tried PBEM if this service did not exist.

When I say what I mean, I'm missunderstood. When I say what I feel, I am often missinterpreted. When I hold my tongue, there is little danger of communications failure. But to remain silent would be too cruel a prison for this often verbose individual. Life is so full of fragile toes.

Don't mind me, I'll go stand in the corner for 20 minutes and contemplate the meaning of communication. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif

Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Edit: I removed any and all offensive text from my previous post. I'll do my best to not let it happen again, sorry.

Re: Conquest PBW (Star Trek Mod v1.35) Question:
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">You didn't have to go do all that. If I misinterpreted you, it's my fault, not yours. I can be rather sensitive sometimes. Sorry.