![]() |
Re: standard ulm in multiplayer....
Ermor may have no gold ecomomy, but its gem economy is important. A valid target for raiding.
|
Re: standard ulm in multiplayer....
Quote:
|
Re: standard ulm in multiplayer....
Condors - the main advice I have for you after the marathon we both played in a few weeks ago is to expend much more than you did then. Much much more. Send out armies in all directions to get lots of provinces => gold => armies and mages. It is often more profitable to capture indies than fighting other players.
|
Re: standard ulm in multiplayer....
Quote:
|
Re: standard ulm in multiplayer....
As far as I understood these marathon games are played on a really huge map with quite a few players only.This is just a paradise for Ermor!
I am sure,that Norfleet is a very experienced player with ermor,but it is more than 100% clear to me,that Ermor is by FAR the strongest nation with such settings. No chance for most other nations IMO. Even if they ally together against Ermor...on such a huge map with few players that will be difficult to do. I recommend using R`lyeh. Nearly all undead troops are mindless but all commanders are not mindless...which means that mind bLasts do target the commanders..and that means that you dont have to deal with the insanely huge number of undeads he will have for sure in these type of game, as these just disappear without commanders. |
Re: standard ulm in multiplayer....
Quote:
[ March 13, 2004, 04:43: Message edited by: Norfleet ] |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.