Re: Clams overpowered?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Which is to create a pretender that is immune to all elemental damage, all but invulnerable to magic resist spells, totally safe since she can never be forced out of her dominion, and capable of destroying any army that doesn't have an enormous number of death mages with it.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Which is obviously the best choice.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Vanheim only, still has to worry about afflictions, and isn't immortal.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Also gets afflictions and isn't immortal.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I'm still waiting for your bless effect based army that can beat your tweaked out VQ.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Which is obviously the problem, since she's immortal and thereby essentially immune to afflictions and death.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">You've just stated that the imbalance exists, so I hardly see why you are arguing that it doesn't.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Which is also just your opinion. Opinions are like *******s, everybody has one.

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Actually I think it's more likely that, like many others, you've decided that it's the chassis that best suits winning the game, and you prefer to win.

Discussions about balance issues are not "whining" - they are undertaken in an attempt to improve the game. If (and I concede this is an overstatement) strategy in Dom2 amounts to little more than choosing the VQ and hoarding clams, then clearly it will become a more complex and interesting game if those imbalances are corrected.

The impression I get is that Illwinter concedes that Dom2 is not as well balanced as it could be, and encourages these discussions. From time to time, they act on our advice and very few people dispute that the game is better for that.

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Clams are fine in a reasonably short game, but as a game drags on clams will represent a larger and larger percentage of total gem income.

If a nation tries to grow more powerful by aquiring provinces for gold and gem income, they have to compete with all the other nations for a finite resource.

If a nation tries to grow more powerful by making clams, all they have to do is invest their gems and wait. The gem income from clams has no upper limit and is a lot less vulnerable than income from provinces.

Growing steadily more powerful without having to fight for it doesn't seem to fit in with the spirit of the game.

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">In other words, something that will drive off the casual invader who hasn't thought his moves out. What the hell are you doing in my dominion anyway? When you fight a tweaked SC on its home turf, it's SUPPOSED to be uphill.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Actually, we were just kicking this around the other night, and the best shot we've found at taking out a VQ conventionally is a Fire-9 bless on Valkyries backed by Dwarves. Fire-9 on flying units will give you the punch needed to take down an VQ, preferrably before it can raise shields, and Petrify will autoparalyze anything it hits to give you that extra time you need. VQs aren't really that tough if you can nail them before they raise their shields: If a VQ has to start towing around chaff, it'll give up much of the benefits it gained. Plenty of other options exist for targetting an SC's weaknesses.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Which is obviously the problem, since she's immortal and thereby essentially immune to afflictions and death.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">You see this as a problem, I see this as a fact of life that SOMETHING will ultimately climb to the top of the heap as the most potent chassis to build on. It's not as if planning around affliction removal is some sort of onerous chore, either. If affliction removal is such an immense problem for you, you haven't planned out an SC core strategy in sufficient depth. If an SC is merely an adjunct to another strategy, then yes, afflictions will eventually cripple you. If your strategy *IS* that SC, afflictions are a nonissue: You will target yourself at their removal. Considering how often I'm the first to GoH anyway, you can clearly see that I've planned this in advance.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I don't see how this is an imbalance against clams, more that water magic could use some better spell options. Clams are a long-run investment that don't truly pay off until the late game. I see no reason why people should be forbidden from aiming at a late-game strategy. I have no objections to seeing clams increased in cost to something like 20W or 10W/5N, but I also do not see them as a serious problem.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">And they all stink. Let me point out that I wasn't the first to air mine out, though. I do, however, feel that it's worth making a counterpoint, lest the only people with something to say be exclusively the whiners.

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

IMHO, clams are not the problem. The main problem is wish. Other things that could be part of the problems are ghost riders, vampire queens, and people playing on big maps with fewer people than the game is balanced for.

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">No, more like something that will drive off virtually every other nation in the entire game, no matter how well together they put their army. How do you expect Marignon, for example, to be able to deal with it when their mages can't touch it?

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Why should a lone SC be able to wipe out an entire mage backed army? You can't require that every offensive battle be fought on friendly dominion, or the game would never end.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">That's not a particularly good strategy, since it is totally nullified by 100% fire resistance, which is far too easy to obtain. The autoparalyze duration of petrify is dependent on magic resist, and it no longer Lasts more than about 4 or 5 turns. That strategy also applies only to Vanheim. If only 1 of the 17 nations can counter a VQ, then there's a problem.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">How exactly are you supposed to do that, when it will just run through your script half as fast as normal, and spend every other action attacking? Give her protection over 25, and virtually nothing will get through.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Such as? Elemental magic is useless thanks to the overpowered elemental armor. Instant kill spells are useless thanks to MR boosting items. Curse is useless as it can't cause Lasting damage.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">That's ignoring the affliction issue entirely.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">The VQ requires no such strategy to remove her afflictions, and there are very few other pretenders that have the recuperation ability and any combat potential of note. The Lord of the Wild, for example, costs 150 points, 50 points for new paths, and is Pangaea only. Any other affliction removal strategy requires large amounts of nature gems, playing Arco, or late game magic.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">If you weren't abusing clams then you wouldn't be able to guarantee that GOH stayed up for more than a few turns.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">If there is no better use for water magic than to convert it into astral magic, then that is a clear imbalance.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">No late-game strategy should allow you to totally wipe out every other player simply because they didn't build exactly the same items as you. If you have another late game strategy of equal power, to a wish per turn, then why don't you spell it out, instead of claiming that clams aren't overpowered.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">That's because I doubt that you've ever played a game where you didn't plan to build hundreds of them yourself.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Whiners? Please. If you don't see a problem with clams, then I suggest you play a game some time where you build absolutely none of them, and your opponent builds a hundred.

[ April 16, 2004, 03:06: Message edited by: Graeme Dice ]

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

Wow so much anger over the poor little clams!
Me...I like my clams with butter and beer!!!

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">If everyone hoarded clams, wouldn't that take care of the problem, as well?

The real problem I see with the game is...troops. If you do not think having more troops than your opponents is unbalancing, I suggest you play a game some time where you build absolutely no troops, and your opponent builds hundreds.

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Actually, I find that it's the people who are deathly afraid of their favourite overpowered strategies being removed that complain the loudest. After all, you manage to show up in every clam and VQ debate and make vague statements about how it's not really that poweful. If it's not powerful Norfleet, then why do you always use the Vampire Queen, and always build as many clams as possible? </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Very true. I find it amusing that somebody, who is using/abusing the same primitive clam-hoarding strategy that requires no strategic skills whatsoever in almost every game that he plays, calls the ones who points to this problem "whiners". It sounds very hypocratic to me. I was avoiding geting personal in the past, but you are crossing the line with your statements Norfleet, where you are trying to paint your opponents as "whinners" and "nerf-criers". Coming from you it just adds weight to anti-clams arguments.

[ April 16, 2004, 03:56: Message edited by: Stormbinder ]

Re: Clams overpowered?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">It might, if every nation had identical access to water magic and the same gem producing site in their capital, but that would destroy the variety in the nations.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">That's a perfectly functional strategy if you've selected the magic paths properly on a vampire queen. No amount of normal troops can defeat her, so it doesn't much matter how many get thrown at her.

Troops also don't provide the resources for unlimited growth of more troops. To get an income of 100 astral pearls from territory, you'd would need to control something around more than half of the world map at 75% magic site frequency.