![]() |
Re: Oh the new forum, it\'s damn small !!!
Another problem with using pixels rather than relative sizes is that it screws up the way the HTML font attributes (such as bold, etc.) are interpreted when small styles are selected.
And I understand what Esben is going through. I use a large monitor also and I had to switch from 1600x1200 down to 1280x1024, and select large/huge (not much difference between them) just to be able to read the forum without rather serious eyestrain. Any study of CSS/HTML coding guides will tell you exactly what Esben has said: you don't use pixels unless there's a darn good reason to, *and* you're an expert web designer. |
Re: Oh the new forum, it\'s damn small !!!
Quote:
I for one am generally happy with the results of the forum change. I am particularly happy that Shrapnel has listened to feedback, and has continued to adjust/improve the forum software after the initial launch. That said, I think Esben's point is more about implementation than design, and it really is widely acknowledged that hardcoding pixel sizes is a bad thing. This is something that could easily be fixed, and would enhance everyone's experience. |
Re: Oh the new forum, it\'s damn small !!!
Yeah I'm with Thufir on this one. I've had no problems with fonts in the new Version of the forums. And having the Posts display in the correct order is just great! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif
As for what particular metric to use when designing the web page: the way you described sounds like a win-win, but I hesitate to ask for much more, given that Shrapnel just made a major change that people have been groaning about for a long while. |
Re: Oh the new forum, it\'s damn small !!!
Quote:
<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre> td.lighttable { font-size: small !important; color: #420 !important; } </pre><hr /> to my user stylesheet. Seems to be working fine http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif Actually, I've also added few other lines to make it look the way I want: <font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre> td.lighttable blockquote hr { display: none !important; } td.lighttable font.post { font-size: small !important; color: black !important;} td.lighttable font.small { border-bottom: 1px solid black !important;} td.lighttable blockquote { padding: 0.3em 0.3em 0.3em 0.3em !important; margin: 0 0 0 0 !important; margin-left: 2em !important; } td.lighttable br { font-size: 0.1em !important; } </pre><hr /> |
Re: Oh the new forum, it\'s damn small !!!
Wow, this got a few more responses than expected. I really do not browse the forums that often anymore, sorry about the delay. I admit I was mostly ranting --- please don't let this belittle the work you have done, Richard et al. The forums has certainly become a much nicer place to visit, and kudos to that. Now for some specific responses:
It is true that it is possible to fix this issue with user-side stylesheet --- which is how I fix two other issues that web-designers have trouble grasping.
<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre> a:link { text-decoration: underline ! important } * { font-family: serif ! important } tt, pre { font-family: monospace ! important } </pre><hr /> But I dislike having site-specific fixes in there. And yes Konqueror (the name of my usual browser) does support text zoom, but it is quite annoying for a number of reasons to use on a forum. Shrapnel forums are, BTW, far from unique in having this problem. Even Gentoo's (in every other way excellent) can't seem to get this simple fact http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif |
Re: Oh the new forum, it\'s damn small !!!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.