.com.unity Forums - abysia strategies

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)

- Dominions 2: The Ascension Wars (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)

- - abysia strategies (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=21517)

Re: abysia strategies

You've hit the point Caseus, more or less.
Don't forget national mages, however, they can still do damage even with the big guys in, but ONLY for certain nations.

In fact I hope in Dom3 troops will be always useful, from the start to the Last.

Re: abysia strategies

Quote:

Cohen said:
Pick always magic-3. It's the lone way to have a decent research, considering your bloodhunters and researchers are capitol only (I mean those cost-effective, even a 200 gold costy ant.salamander can research).

Hear the ripping sounds? That's me tearing up my strategies. The thumping sounds is me banging my head against the wall.

Magic 3 because your researchers are capital only? Sigh. Should have been obvious but somehow I missed it completely.

I can't argue with you one bit about the HI. I abandon them once the IDs and Devils are out the door anyway. So skip Production 3.

Okay, back to the drawing board with a Ghost King this time.

Thanks Cohen! Your post was extremely insightful.

Caseus

Re: abysia strategies

Quote:

Caseus said:
For me, single player IS the game.

In multiplayer you have to contend with cheaters. You have to contend with people exploiting loopholes in the game system to do things the designers never intended. The actual fun parts of the game -- the huge variety of spells, magic items, and units -- are lost in the intense competitiveness of multiplayer. "You can't do X, that doesn't work in multiplayer!"

I suspect it's far worse than that. I suspect that in multiplayer, your race is merely a chassis for getting out the Big Summons. The incredibly diversity of races and units is virtually meaningless compared to the power of Ice Devils, Air Queens, etc.

Having never played multiplayer, I could be wrong. But I doubt it.

Caseus

you really are in no position to say. Frankly, you are quite wrong, overall. It is in SP that there is no diversity, because all tactics are about equally successful against the lay down and die AI.

Re: abysia strategies

Caseus, some remarks about beloved Aby http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif
Scales : don't bother with Prod, get Magic-3 instead, and pay a better Pretender with Death-3 too ! With Aby I like a SC chassis with let's say 3 non-Abysian paths better than a RM.
The worst challenge with Aby (in MP) is to get a decent research IMHO, so Magic scales (and hopes of getting a Sage site..) are required.
Demons : Ice Devils are fine, but aren't at all Abysia-friendly - they radiate frost when Abysians radiates heat, you've got no way of getting them except through Pretender, Archdevils are much more "getting along" Abysia (ok, they're "worse" when compared all other things equal, but "all other things" are *never* equal http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif !)

About MP: no, MP isn't a unfriendly jungle of cheaters, I play (way too many) MP games with a small friendly (and mostly French) group, and we enjoy the diversity of the game, play all races even if not competitive (Tien Chi, Mictlan..), do some roleplay, mucho diplomacy (and some backstabbing), play sometimes with mods, on unknown maps, with special victory conditions, and enjoy it http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif THAT'S the game !! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

Re: abysia strategies

Quote:

Caseus said:
For me, single player IS the game.

In multiplayer you have to contend with cheaters.

It doesn't seem there are cheaters left since Norfleet quitted.

Quote:

Caseus said:
You have to contend with people exploiting loopholes in the game system to do things the designers never intended. The actual fun parts of the game -- the huge variety of spells, magic items, and units -- are lost in the intense competitiveness of multiplayer. "You can't do X, that doesn't work in multiplayer!"

No, X works, but only in right circumstances. The fun of MP is to figure out which X will work in the current situation. Concerning the loopholes, there aren't many, and they are not significant, at Last significant ones got patched. But of course in the game of such complexity, no known loopholes doesn't mean that they don't exist.

Quote:

Caseus said:
I suspect it's far worse than that. I suspect that in multiplayer, your race is merely a chassis for getting out the Big Summons. The incredibly diversity of races and units is virtually meaningless compared to the power of Ice Devils, Air Queens, etc.

Ice Devils, Air Queens etc are not particularly strong in MP. In SP they look strong just because AI doesn't know how to deal with them. Against human players, those ID and AQs will be dying left and right. It's true there's a period in the early game when you can safely raid many nations with ID or AQ, but that period doesn't Last long. After that they become just super-commanders (as opposite to super-combatants) who need a strong army to achieve anything.

The nation still makes a difference until the very end. Mostly due to the mages, national troops still remain useful though. Something has to make numbers in your army. At that stage distinction between most of national troops become minimal, however some nations (R'lyeh, Caelum, C'tis) still have national troops that can play distinctive role on the battlefield.

Re: abysia strategies

I'd say any stealth army has usefulness until the end of the game. Though my concept of "End of the Game" might vary from others, but usually until a decisive win or the game becomes to micro to play.

Re: abysia strategies

Cohen,

sometimes I wonder if we are playing the same game.

Quote:

And with their low morale they'll flee very easily

Moral 11 is low? Sorry to inform you it is soild moral. Is it the best in the game? No. Is it soild? Yes.

Quote:

For productivity, it's not that useful, soon the heavy infantry get useless AND considering that a rout in any battle == them all dead, AND the time you need to replace an army of them, AND a huge amount of time to bring them in an attack position, AND if in early expansion you get your way closed by another nation, or by a sudden appearing of 4 heavy cavalry province all neighbouring the new aquired province and you've to waste a turn to get back, you'll discover the Abysya Infantry is very poor for their cost.

BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. All HI is move 1. They all have the same problem. Oh and for your 8 or so gold more than "normal" HI you get +1-+3 strength, a heat aura, immunity to fire, and +3-5 HP. Sounds like a deal to me. Abysian HI are excellent HI. Right near the top of the HI food chain.

Quote:

But the population will die however.

Yes you will lose 1/2 of your population in 115.8 turns. Boohoohoohoohoo. It's a huge advanatge to Abysia.

Quote:

Pick always magic-3. It's the lone way to have a decent research, considering your bloodhunters and researchers are capitol only (I mean those cost-effective, even a 200 gold costy ant.salamander can research).

Yes abysia is poor at research no doubt. However if you run the numbers you will see that those "useless" mages you can recruit away from your home province ( Anathemant Salamanders ) are actually just about as good at research as Warlocks/Demonbreds ( At magic1 best researcher: demonbred 2.67 RP/gold over 30 turns, Anathemant Salamander 2.96 RP/god over 30 turns ... at magic 3 Warlock Apprentice 1.76 gold/rp vs. Anathemant Salamander
1.78 gold/rp ... wow it's really close isn't it?).

But why let *FACTS* stop you from spouting your crap about abyisa? Keep it comming!

Quote:

The lone Abysya benefit is that her blood hunters start with 2 blood

Yes poor abysia. Boohoohoo. Let's not mention that they have excellent HI, that they have extra points from heat and death, that their casters are beefy and can stand closer to the front line than mortals, that all of their troops are 100% fire resistant thus fire magic can be used as much as possible without worry.

No, no. Their *only* advanatge is that they have blood2 mages right out of the gate and can win the race to ID's ( assuming that your pretender can cast that spell ) quite easily. Oh, btw, that is a very nice perk.

Quote:

They're good raiders if led by a Demonbred, they can't hide but they fly.

Good raiders? Demons are top tier magical HI. They stomp noraml armies flat. 25 devils led by a demonbred is a flying army of destruction able to defeat moral armies thrice their size.

Quote:

Fire Magic doesn't count a lot.

Nope it sucks. Worth nothing. Remove those mages from Abysia. They don't matter anyway. What? You would not want them to do that? Why not? I thought it was useless? Guess it's not.

Quote:

But usually expect Abysya get outmatched in blood by Mictlan, default Jotunheim and Black Forest Ulm.

Please define your terms. Outmatched? By what metric? The Warlock Apprentice is clearly more cost effective than the Jotun Skratti at blood hunting. Oh you mean they have a more cost effective blood hunter with the 1 in 4 Vaetti Hag's that have blood. But that's not going to help them get one of the 11 blood SC's is it?

Black Forest has a more cost efficient blood hunter? You don't mean the Member of the 2d Trier do you? I don't imagine that you do mean him, since he's worse than the Warlock Apprentice. Oh wait you mean the Vampire Count well those are nice and all. But they are not going to be blood hunting en mass for quite a while are they? And don't they have better things to do anyway? Oh and they have quite a substantial cost ... it's not gold however.

Mictlain. Yes the best blood hunting nation in the game. No doubt. They pay for it thought don't they? They *have* to blood sacrifice to stop dominion death. They have horrible base troops ( although quite blessable ). Their mages are capital only ( I thought you said this was a crushing problem for Abysia ). They pay through the nose for their power with blood. And well they should blood is *very* powerful. Yet abysia pays almost nothing in comparison. Weird. And amazingly Abysia BoH is comparable with Mictlain.

Quote:

Thanks Cohen! Your post was extremely insightful.

Well other than just about all of it being wrong. You are right! Oh he is right about the GK. It's really very good currently.

Re: abysia strategies

I've always found Abysia relatively easu to play, and have found a couple of good pretenders for them that don't really act as SC but whoi nicely patch their weaknesses. And anybody who complains about not being able to get dwarven hammers with Abysia is just plain incompetent. Get earth warlock, forge bloodstone, equip, forge boots, equip, forge hammer, repeat hammer, start cranking out stuff. Having a pretender with E4 or above is also good, because half of your mages (and all of the artillery ones) are sacred, so they get help from the reinvigo blessing, especially if you can equipe them with reinvigo items. My first MP, Back to the Fray, I'm playing Abysia, and I'm not doing badly at all (relatively speaking), but I've also been lucky.

Edi

Edi

Re: abysia strategies

Quote:

Caseus said:
In multiplayer you have to contend with cheaters.

There aren't many of those left with the current Version.

Quote:

You have to contend with people exploiting loopholes in the game system to do things the designers never intended.

If the various gem-producing items and supercombatants were intended to be completely useless, then the game would have made them that way.

Quote:

Having never played multiplayer, I could be wrong.

You are.

Re: abysia strategies

Quote:

Caseus said:
Magic 3 because your researchers are capital only? Sigh. Should have been obvious but somehow I missed it completely.

Magic 3 is a waste of design points usually, since the magic scale has diminishing returns.

Quote:

I can't argue with you one bit about the HI. I abandon them once the IDs and Devils are out the door anyway. So skip Production 3.

That will result in you watching as somebody who didn't skip production 3 rolling over you in the first 20 turns.

Quote:

Thanks Cohen! Your post was extremely insightful.

Cohen doesn't actually know how to play Abysia well, so I'd take his advice with a grain of salt.