Re: Just when you thought it was safe to go back..
 

Baron Munchausen said:
"You seem to have completely missed the point of my post. Why did you bother to quote it? You should have replied directly to the original post."

I was gonna link to the Fark discussion, but the mods over there appear to have purged the story. As I recall, the people over there had the same opinion as you ... how could he produce the volume implied, therefore story is a probable hoax.

And don't mind the random off topic rambling of mine tacked on, I'm just trying to open the discussion.

To generate a further tangent: is it just me, or is the new board's quote function just a little bit unwieldly? I don't want to restart the "old Boards, new Boards discussion", but the box drawn mass of wasted white space. I took out the QUOTE block, but left the "said:" and bold and italics in. Is that a better way to highlight your thoughts, give credit where it was due, and not make the responce take up too much screen real estate?

Re: Just when you thought it was safe to go back..
 

You could put quotation marks around the quoted text, as any sort of standard written form uses...

Re: Just when you thought it was safe to go back..
 

Depending on how many dishes he ahem pleasured himself too LOL He would be able to produc quite enough, considering the fact that he probobly wasn' getting any sex I'm sure he had a surplus http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/tongue.gif

Re: Just when you thought it was safe to go back..
 

Bleah. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/tongue.gif And I thought the Fark discussion had taken a nasty turn as the amount of specificity in the discussion increased.