Re: Council of Wyrms - Temples Poll
 

I hope he's not too disappointed...

Re: Council of Wyrms - Temples Poll
 

in that case Vlesthrot i offer my sincerest apologies for my un-worthy self invading a decision clearly meant for you almighty wyrms

Re: Council of Wyrms - Temples Poll
 

No problem shovah, this is mainly just trash-talk, and just hoped to get more people talking than we currently do for anything on the Wiki. I don't mind outsider comments and this should in no way be interpreted as "official". If I wanted an official vote, I would make a proposition!

Re: Council of Wyrms - Temples Poll
 

personally, it surely sounds like an affront to the wyrm's dignity - he should be allowed to personally raze any such vulnerable temples http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Re: Council of Wyrms - Temples Poll
 

So, does this mean you'll also support my keeping the castle that Pangaea's built on top of it? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/smirk.gif

Er, never mind, you're not in the game. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...es/redface.gif

Re: Council of Wyrms - Temples Poll
 

hey, i'm officially designated as a possible alternate/sub wyrm :p

Re: Council of Wyrms - Temples Poll
 

As far as temples built on outlying lands without a fort, I would say that this is definitely a prime candidate for obtaining a Coucil vote to raze. Certainly, most wyrms would support a proposition to raze a temple on someone's doorstep. Especially if it comes with a bribe. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

It is certainly a very aggressive move to build temples near another wyrm's capitol, but well within the rules of the game.