![]() |
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
I'd have to test-drive it. Sounds neat so far.
|
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
We are limited to what we can say for or against SLOTs.
|
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
I did not request it and I am not opposed to it.
Fyron: Your bias is implied in many ways. My first thought while reading the poll description was, "Fyron found out there might be slotted components in SEV and thought 'Who the hell ever asked for that? I sure didn't and I don't want it.'" |
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
Quote:
OK, for SEV I'm only going to play races with square blocky ships like the Borg! Yup, the Borg are my favorite race now. Hopefully the Borg dreadnought will be just a huge cube full of slots that takes up the entire ship design window. With the maximized number of components, it will easily beat other races with thin spindly-shaped ships. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif |
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
Ships still have a tonnage as dictated by the game and not by the number of slots they have... what BM was saying below was that if slots were based on each ship so some might have an advantage in how you could arrange components...
|
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
The number of slots will most likely be standardized.
|
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
Naturally there is always a reason for making a poll... But I did try to keep the options covering everything. I originally had it say yes, no and don't care, but it was pointed out to me that it would be a more useful poll to have the broader options currently in place.
|
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
Quote:
That said I really do like the idea of firing arcs and directed damage, but like Munchausen said there should be a standard grid for ships, I know that would probably mess up the current ship design window, since the grid would not fit on the artwork, but the ships for SEV are quite low on polygons and have low res textures anyhow, and these flaws are clearly visible in the shipdesign window. The shipset artwork (though very nicely done) is not designed for showing the ships zoomed in that far. So my advice would be to change the shipdesign window so it gives a standard grid for each shipsize without the top-down view of the ship. You could replace it with a nice looking texture or some fancy artwork. The ship's artwork could still be displayed somewhere in a corner of the screen at a more apropriate zoom-level, maybe with some nice rotating animation. (Anyhow thats just my opinion, based on incomplete knowledge and vague assumptions on how the current seV system works, I have not yet voted for this reason) |
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
In the Starfury demo, I found the amount of slots on the mere Destroyer to be immense; if the screenshots are any indication (Jraenar Frigate) the same thing is true with SEV. So unless either A.) you've got ships with immense tonnage ratings or B.) you're placing lots of low-tonnage comps (or C.) both) you won't run out of slots, and their main function is to determine component placement i.e. what Slick said about wet navy ship designs.
About the poll; I didn't vote, as I never actually requested slots, but I do think they're a good idea. In my case "no I didn't request it" means "I never really thought about it". |
Re: SE5 Poll on Slot Layout, take 2
Quote:
There are also very real differences between the shipsets in the proportions of armor, outer hull, and inner hull slots. This also will make for arbitrary and unfair ship design restrictions. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.