![]() |
Re: Tactical CS?
Point: I'm not sure but I belive that bombs and air strikes have different suppression results.
|
Re: Tactical CS?
It would appear so. However, it is a large subset of the CS weapons in use in the time period I'm working on.
Basically these are the things I was looking at when I started thinking about doing this: 66mm CS rockets for use with the XM191 and M202 launchers (XM96) 2.75" CS warheads for the Mk 40 rocket motor for use with standard launcehrs of the period (XM80 and XM99) Hand grenades and Airdropped or sprayed weapons (including cluster bombs and things like the BLU-52/B) |
Re: Tactical CS?
As an odd update to this, I just tested out the effects of a class 14 weapon (cluster weapon) with 0 everything except class and range. The Vietcong units were hit indirectly (the engaging aircraft ARVN aircraft did not target) and all recieved 0 damage and suppression between 28-30 (for units both in cover and not. With the erradic spread of gas this might actually be the way to do this. The visual is not correct, but neither was the flame burst of napalm.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.