![]() |
Re: Sucker-punching the AI...
While the AI will always be exploitable, I think that dipomacy-wise it should'nt be hard to make it difficult the abuse the AI, by making it "make sense", and when you get things wrong, err on the side of making the AI more strict with his deals.
Should the AI ally with you? If your army strength is greater than his, yes (but if you are LA Ermor, then no. If you are Jotnheim or Vanheim, make him consider your troops as worth more than just military score) If your army strength is much greater than his, no, and he should seek other allies to defend against you. Should the AI trade you X of Y gems for W of Z gems? If he has many Y gems and a high Y gem income, and only few mages to make use of them, but has few of Z gems and low Z gems income, and many mages that can make us of them, then yes. In the opposite case, no. Should the AI trade item X for item Y? If Y is harder to forge than X, then yes. Otherwise, no. etc. The only place where there's some real trouble is with gold, since its harder to assess its value, especially in relation to other things. Forbidding the AI from trading gold would probably fix that, I guess. |
Re: Sucker-punching the AI...
Quote:
For example since I have yet to see an AI opponent cast "flames from the sky" on me... I won't be casting the spell on them. I do wish the AI opponents would use more gems for global spells based on the number of turns which passed during the game. Thus an AI opponent should use more gems casting a global spell on turn_85 compared with casting the global spell on turn_35. Perhaps we'll see this improved within a patch. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.