Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

You need hull sizes like Juggernaut to provide a continuity between a baseship (somewhat larger than a dread) and a worldship (absolutely enormous).

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

I second the battlecruiser and I think another type of colony ship might be a good idea.

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

Aww, nobody likes Escort.

Eh. Corvette does sound neater anyway, even if it doesn't maintain continueity.

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

I vote escort!

not that it matters, it's just model names anyway.

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

Everything matters; there is only different levels of relavency.

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

Vote: Large colony ship or resource ship?

I think only one mod, maybe 2, actually used the SE4 resource ship. It didn't seem to have much utility.

Also, should we specify that the small fighter should be interceptor-like, and the large fighter should be bomber-like? The regular fighter would be something in-between. This would create a bit more uniformity, and would provide the opportunity for modders to have different fighter hull types without needing to specify extra models that aren't part of the neostandard.

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

Why have resource ships, when you have freighters?

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

I vote large colony ship. I guess Kana's right, freighters are useful as resource ships, but it would be nice to have another size of colony ship.

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

I vote for escort.

Re: Finalizing Neostandard
 

I vote Corvette. An Escort is more of a type of duty than a class of ship.