Re: Entirely moronic question
 

Maybe, maybe not. But the fact is that snakes use thier own poison to kill thier prety... and then immediately consume it with no ill effect. Thats was the point I was driving at.

Re: Entirely moronic question
 

but the poison they have is only stunning the victims not killing them, so the poison probably has onlyill effects if injected into muscles & bloodstream (as said earlier already)

Re: Entirely moronic question
 

As stated above, curare, used by South American natives, was effective on arrows as it killed if it got into the bloodstream. It was harmless when ingested, as it couldn't be absorbed and is (I think) ultimately broken down by the digestive system. On the other hand, you'd need to worry if you tried that and you had a stomach ulcer.

They could also feasibly use a poison they have a natural resistance or acquired tolerance for: lots of animals use poison to kill their prey but don't die when they eat the victim.

Re: Entirely moronic question
 

KO: Whenever you see something that doesn't make sense, the answer is a wizard did it.

Player: But what about the-

KO: Wizard.

Player: But surely that means the-

KO: A WIZARD DID IT.

Re: Entirely moronic question
 

I believe so -- at least in the case of arrow poison.

Quite a few are neurotoxins which interfere with either acetylcholine or acetylcholinesterase. The former is a neurotransmitter that's important in the process by which nerves stimulate muscle tissue; the latter is an enzyme which deals with acetylcholine. Both are found in numerous species, so these neurotoxins are not particularly specific. Block the former, and muscles relax; block the latter, and muscles contract. Since the continual smooth functioning of certain muscles is rather vital (the intercostal muscles and the heart tissue, for instance), interfering with either to an extreme tends to be quite lethal.

Since they're not specific to a species... I'd go with the metabolism-vs-bloodstream theory.