![]() |
Re: Newbie/demo question
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Next fun question, can warp points be set to something other than instantaneous? If I wanted warp lines to represent trade routes, I'd like for them to take X number of turns based upon distance and possibly drive types.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>You might want to look at suicide_junkie's FTL propulsion map, and my Hypermaze mod (URL in sig), which was inspired by it.
------------------ Cap'n Q My first mod! Hypermaze quadrant The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all of its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should go far. -- HP Lovecraft, "The Call of Cthulhu" [This message has been edited by capnq (edited 27 September 2001).] |
Re: Newbie/demo question
Thanks. SJ's map is... interesting, but perhaps a bit too convoluted for what I want (being the simple wargamer that I am.) I found that laying the star systems on a hex grid renders the instantaneous effect moot with a minimum of distortion. The warp points show up as a grid of triangles. By placing the warp points at (0,3),(0,9),(6,0),(6,12),(12,3), and (12,9) within a system, each warp point is equi-distant from each other and simply links the edges of star systems together. The 'perk' of such a layout is that no single warp point is better than another. So, the free roaming nature of the universe that I want to model is preserved.
The 'grid' option in the map editor comes close, but it skips some intersections and cuts corners on others. Perhaps a future Version of the map editor will have a true grid setting (one system at every intersection even if it is empty, with an all diagonals or no diagonals option) and a hex grid -- TAZ [Oh yeah, stopped by the FedEX ground terminal at lunch time just so I could play with the full Version before getting home.] |
Re: Newbie/demo question
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>within a system, each warp point is equi-distant from each other and simply links the edges of star systems together. The 'perk' of such a layout is that no single warp point is better than another. So, the free roaming nature of the universe that I want to model is preserved.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>That is especially true for my map. The warp points are all at the edge of the system, so you take whichever is closest to your present position. Once you have "gone to warp", you travel one galaxy-map square using 1 movement point. It then takes 1MP to return to normal speed at your destination.
While you are in FTL space, you can wander the galaxy map as you please, the only restriction is that you cannot stop in an "empty" space between the star systems. You can in effect, sneak around enemy held systems, as long as your enemy dosen't have an FTL interceptor force on patrol. EDIT: Reading the entire thread, I cannot see why my map does not suit your needs. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>If I wanted warp lines to represent trade routes, I'd like for them to take X number of turns based upon distance and possibly drive types. ... Such empty systems would represent the space between worlds and allow for 'deep space' combat. Multiple nodes would lengthen the journey<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Using my map, you get: - FTL around the edge of a system to get to the far side. (2mp) - Multi-turn travel times entirely FTL. - Go from any system to any other system directly, though it may take a while. - FTL space cannot be blockaded, and completely protecting a system from FTL attacks in nearly impossible. (Random movement ability in hyperspace disrupts blockades) - Ships can be lost in hyperspace: with random movement of 2, a ship with 1MP is helpless and must wait to drift past a starsystem. [This message has been edited by suicide_junkie (edited 27 September 2001).] |
Re: Newbie/demo question
Nothing wrong with your map, I'm just being difficult. :-) Actually, I'm wanting to port a hand moderated PBEM game to SE4, so I have specific mapping and technology 'issues' to overcome. In some places I'll have to bend to SE4's methods, but if I can customize SE4 to a Fire on the Suns method or set of values, I will. When done, the mod might look like SE4, but that will be skin deep only.
-- Todd (mad scientist/game designer wannabe) Zircher |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.