![]() |
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
Quote:
Otherwise, yeah, single-target spells are a good option. Does MA Ermor still have Augur Elders? If so, they can also spam Incinerate at Alt 5. I can't remember what else is available, except obviously Disintegrate at Alt 8. With all your death mages, Disintegrate should be pretty awesome, although the range is short. -Max |
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
I'm assuming Drain Life doesn't work on lifeless targets?
|
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
Banefire (53+ ap damage) is ea ermors traditional answer to SC's.
I haven't played MA ermor in awhile... |
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
MA Ermor is Death and Astral and some randoms. No Augurs.
|
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
Quote:
As far as I remember trampling works like this: Check for Defense - (fatigue / 10) against 10 If failed then damage is 8 + 2 x trampler size Quick calcs with a Bane Lord: HP 42, Base prot 21, Defense 13 (thanks to a Def +3 from the default 2 handed bane blade, otherwise 10) no shield. By the way would the +3 Def from the Bane Blade be used against trample, or just the base 10? If we give him an elf bane (one handed, Def 0) then base defense goes down to 10 !!! oupss. And suddenly you have only around 46 % chances to avoid the trample. Boots of behemoth give you size 6 so dammage would be 8 + 6 x 2 = 20 - protection / 2 (piercing) = 10 or thereabouts. With 42 HP you can only withstand around 4-5 trample hits and that is assuming the /bane Lord is in immaculate condition before reaching the marble oracle. So I presume getting that Bane Lord ethereal or lucky is paramount. The marble oracle in the other hand has around 80-90 HP... Does anyone know how's the dammage calculated for an Elf Bane? Would A Vine Shield make any difference to Defense? Do boots of quickness help with Defense? |
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
FYI, Boots of the Behemoth do NOT change your size to six, they simply give the wearer the trample attack on anyone smaller. BE and Luck would definitely help, as would using any of your own size 6 units. I'm not sure how useful it would be to try and counter with one size 6 unit to occupy it and one or two smaller ones to do the damage. What would be the priority of the oracle?
|
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
Marble oracles are only size 4, so a bane lord would do just fine.
|
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
Ah I think i got it from the database. Elf Bane has a "Slay Magic" effect which means that for every successfull hit the magic victim will need to have a successfull mr roll or suffer 999 damage.
|
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
Quote:
Alternatively, you could give a commander a cat charm, bracers of protection, a main gauche and elf bane/smasher/dusk dagger. If you really don't care about the expense add in chainmail of displacement and switch out the bracers for a ring of regeneration. Or go for thunder bows, eyes of aiming and boots of giant strength. One of the above should work. Actually banelords have pretty decent base defense skill (14), it's just they're wearing pretty heavy armor. If you could get one chainmail of displacement and a 0 def hat, it would be at 20 defense. That's not too shabby. |
Re: Counter against Agartha's Marble Oracles?
Crusherknack works very well.
Edit: I meant Smasher, which has Crusherknack as a secondary effect IIRC. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.