Re: a sub needed for the Spellchecker game (T'ien C'hi)
 

I looked at the Ermor position earlier. To be honest I think it might as well be set to AI. With no research at this stage in the game, but huge armies, the AI would probably do a reasonably similar job to a player. That's not to put Hadrian off, but it would probably be more fun to play T'ien Ch'i unless he likes really odd positions.

Re: a sub needed for the Spellchecker game (T'ien C'hi)
 

Shoo, Llama, shoo! We need a sub! :)

He's right though. Ermor has a very low research.

Re: a sub needed for the Spellchecker game (T'ien C'hi)
 

Hmm. True. I haven't changed the e-mail yet, so if Hadrian wants to change, I'd be okay with that.

Re: a sub needed for the Spellchecker game (T'ien C'hi)
 

lol, how it is possible to have 320 research on turn 44?

It seems ermor would be a hopeless position, but subbing is more community service than gaming anyway, so i would still play ermor if necessary.

But if no one will take over TC, i think i would rather play TC than ermor.

Re: a sub needed for the Spellchecker game (T'ien C'hi)
 

I'll give you T'ien C'hi and we can put Ermor to AI. There is no reason to force you to play a hopeless situation. The nation is clearly doomed (although it's kicking my ***).

I'll set your e-mail shortly and then we can start the game sunday.

Re: We need someone to set a nation to AI.
 

I can turn Ermor AI if you like. Have sent you a PM Burnsaber.