.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   Warcry - new semi-rand game :) (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44228)

Zeldor November 1st, 2009 05:03 PM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
Ok, game is oficially full. PM me or post here that 3 nations you'd prefer not to get. Ironhawk will roll nations then.

I will work on the map tomorrow, should have most of stuff on it done. Still waiting on suggestions about balance fixes. And some prov names would be cool too.

Folket November 2nd, 2009 11:48 AM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
I would like to join in this game. I do not want to play Atlantis, R'leyh or Ulm.

Folket November 2nd, 2009 11:49 AM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
... I did not expect there to be a second page with this few number of posts... =(

Lingchih November 3rd, 2009 12:30 AM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
OK, I've been testing. F&W thugs seem a bit, um, weak? Not complaining really... I would rather have them than not have them.

quantum_mechani November 3rd, 2009 10:02 AM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
I would like to request removing pyre vines from the mod. I have a number of problems with them:

1. On thematic grounds I dislike map move 2 'plants'.
2. They have such a bizarre heap of abilities, it looks weird and messy and it's hard to judge balance.
3. The graphics look a bit ugly.
4. They are not thugs or SCs.

Zeldor November 3rd, 2009 10:33 AM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
1 Attachment(s)
Ok, MA Scenario map is ready, let me know if there are any problems with it.

QM suggests that no compensation is given to weaker nations, any other comments on that?

Lingchih November 3rd, 2009 09:32 PM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
I am also fine with no compensation for the weak positions. Mainly because I'm not sure what to suggest you give them.

Ferrosol November 4th, 2009 06:02 AM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lingchih (Post 717038)
I am also fine with no compensation for the weak positions. Mainly because I'm not sure what to suggest you give them.

Same here.Have only tested the map with MA Arco but one thing that did come up was that one of the provinces next door to their start has a guaranteed navigator recruitment. Is it really wise to give them access to A given that they can communion up pretty damn well without it?

Zeldor November 4th, 2009 08:27 AM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
Wasn't it C'tis getting them? Hmm... There is also a connection N of Bandar cap that should not exist, I will remove it.

Anyway, I need 3 nation statements to get nations rolled. I need them from Baalz, Pashadawg and Zlefin.

zlefin November 4th, 2009 09:34 AM

Re: Warcry - new semi-rand game :)
 
due to my illness, i'm going to have to pass on this game.
I do look forward to hearing how FW thugs do, as this will be the first real game balance test of it. I know they're a little weak, that's by design; i meant them to be significantly weaker than death summons of the same cost. As to the vines, they were put in as compensation for the loss of fever fetishes (which was part of Zeldor's original request). I didn't put anything at the clam replacement since naiads already occupy that slot. And i didn't do any other path things since that was outside the original goal of the mod.
Zlefin :sick:
PS don't forget my lances and weapons mod zeldor! sometime i wanna see that get into a game too, but I may not be up to harassing you about it for awhile.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.