Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

Also, might I suggest adding Niefelheim to the list of nations Baalz was good enough to suggested above? They have a reasonable amount of armor on most of their troops.

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

Don't add all the power nations - I mean MA ermor benefits hugely from having cranked up resources, but it's still not a good idea to add them to the game.

Niefel are about blessed supermen, not heavy armor.

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

Shortly after I started the thread, I made a very long post about which nations probably should be disallowed, but it seems never to have made it in. Dammit!

Here's a short version:

I think giant nations should be allowed only if they would fit well with the human nations and their sacreds are not intended to be production limited. Ashdod is clearly out. Hinnom likewise. Formoria out. I think Jotunheim could be in. If people want them. Niefelheim I think is too much, but I suppose it is arguable. I don't know enough about Gath or Utgard to have an opinion.

Sauromatia I think should be out since armor doesnt help against the androphag archers. Which is a shame cause they have some lovely cav.

Baalz list looks good to me mostly. EA TC would get stomped imho, but if someone wishes to play them they may.

I think if we allow water nations we need to allow more than just Oceania. Doesn't atlantis have insanely heavy troops?

My list included MA and LA Pan, and Machaka, if anyone wants them. MA Ctis should nominally qualify, but the miasma makes it up for debate.

Bogarus makes me nervous, but if no one else objects, I have little experience with their cbm selves and will not disallow them. LA Ulm I though was just undead and blood, but I have no problem with them if no one else does.

EA abysia also makes me nervious, since their sacreds are clearly meant to be resource limited, but unless someone objects I guess they can be included.

Objections to any nation or nominations for ones left out may be made by PM to preserve privacy, if you wish.

While I personally think random assignment would be cool, I wanted a small enough game where it isnt feasible, given the number of nations we have.

Everyone send me your top 3 choices (by PM or post here) and I will work out the assignments. I really have no idea for a map but I guess we should wait and see how many people we have here. I think I would like to limit it to 10 or 12.

Thanks!

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

My picks:
1. EA Abysia
2. MA Abysia
3. MA Marignon

I like burning things.:) Oh, and I think Niefleheim should be banned as it doesn't really match the spirit of the game, that is,lots and lots of heavily armoured soldiers.

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

Some crude testing suggests the economic settings should be something like 150% income 300% resources and 175% supplies. Any objections/ suggestions?

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

My picks:

1. MA Ulm
2. LA Ulm
3. LA Man

Personally, I think that MA C'tis should be allowed to play if someone wants them, simply because the Miasma is made up for them having, arguably, some of the worst troops of the nations listed.

And those settings sound good rabelais.

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

Very interesting setting, which could contribute to give this nice mid-game feeling a long time.

I would like to play, here are my picks:
1. MA Shinumaya
2. MA Agartha
3. LA Atlantis

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

1. LA TC
2. LA Jomon
3. LA Ulm

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

Is this game still going to go ahead?

Re: New MP game-Metal on Metal (discussion+recruiting)
 

Sure. I was hoping for more people. So who has a map they like for 5?