.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   WinSPWW2 (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=139)
-   -   Question: Weapons sizes (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=50958)

RetLT September 12th, 2015 11:42 AM

Re: Weapons sizes
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Suhiir (Post 831378)
Quote:

Originally Posted by troopie (Post 831377)
I've always heard that the M1911 was designed to be a stopper. The pistols used by the US Army would not stop a Moro crazed on dagga and the M1911 was designed to do that. When it came into service the Moro uprising was long over, but that's an army for you.

troopie

Personally I've always MUCH preferred the .45

I was not a big fan of the .45. Too much kick, too heavy and limited ammo. The .40 Glock had less recoil and weight plus a larger ammo capacity.

Suhiir September 19th, 2015 06:13 PM

Re: Weapons sizes
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RetLT (Post 831381)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Suhiir (Post 831378)
Quote:

Originally Posted by troopie (Post 831377)
I've always heard that the M1911 was designed to be a stopper. The pistols used by the US Army would not stop a Moro crazed on dagga and the M1911 was designed to do that. When it came into service the Moro uprising was long over, but that's an army for you.

troopie

Personally I've always MUCH preferred the .45

I was not a big fan of the .45. Too much kick, too heavy and limited ammo. The .40 Glock had less recoil and weight plus a larger ammo capacity.

Never fired a .40, but I want to hit something once not need to use 3+ rounds making the larger ammo capacity pointless. This of course assumes you hit, true a larger ammo capacity give you more chances to do so.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.