![]() |
Re: War is boring link
Quote:
Interesting....... I haven't received any......did you give them your email address ? |
Re: War is boring link
Quote:
|
Re: War is boring link
Quote:
Never underestimate the power of online promotion... |
Re: War is boring link
Quote:
|
Re: War is boring link
Quote:
|
Re: War is boring link
The article repeats the errenous idea that SPWAW is superior because it was based on SP3 - an idea that in my experience is popular with people that don't play the games much.
This however: Quote:
|
Re: War is boring link
Prefer something between battalion- or regimental-sized forces. Maybe 50-100 individual units/vehicles/batteries total. Much more than that my Godlike concern for each precious instrument of martial will suffers from compassion fatigue.
|
Re: War is boring link
Quote:
The beginning of a battle is usually the most tedious one for me because of that. |
Re: War is boring link
Must admit I would find 30-60 units restrictive.
Will play any size from 20 units up but probably 80-120 is the norm. Bigger just equates to larger maps & longer game turns 200 units is no issue with the following exception much along RightDeves comment. Large scenarios especially if using modified units unless they are well structured it just takes to long to identify what you have & where. Yours are no problem & I will give SAS Troop a nod for his being easy to get to grips with despite often being quite large. |
Re: War is boring link
Depends on my mood that day ;^) I enjoy playing large scenarios, though for my campaigns, I usually will play only a company or two of troops. Larger forces take too long to get through the campaign, especially the Long Campaign in SPWW2.
I will say in a small scenario, you do feel the loss of a tank more than in a large scenario... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.