Re: An idea to balance out tech
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Complicated isn't quite the right word. It's not that people want a more 'complicated' system with more micromanagement. It's that they want a better one. Subtle might be a better word. More sophisticated. Better adapted to the game world.

Your observations above are perfect examples of the crude level of interface between intel and the rest of the game. Would a saboteur of even average intelligence use the exact same sort of explosives or other destructive device against all of stored Satellites, Troop mechs, and Weapon Platforms? Shouldn't mines go up together in one big BOOM when sabotaged? Instead only as many get destroyed as the initial damage can account for, just like with troops. If the nature of the attack is to 'interfere with maintenance' rather than plant a bomb, then it ought to have some way of affecting large numbers of units even when the damage total of the units increases in the late game. But it doesn't. It's the same old trick from day one till the end of the game.

The other intel attacks suffer from the same trouble. Poisoning the population is the same attack regardless of the size of the colony. Shouldn't it be possible for the population to recognize that something is wrong after a certain amount of time and find the source of the trouble? In that case, only a certain proportion of the population should be poisoned, not a fixed number. A certain number of people would eat the poisoned food, for example, and then the civil government would put the clues together and find the source. Larger colonies would have more people eating on whatever regular schedule your race eats on, so it would be possible to do more damage at once, while smaller colonies would have fewer people eating on the schedule and the same amount of time to find the source (assuming the same level of 'cleverness' in hiding it) would result in fewer people being poisoned.

This is the problem with the intel system. It's not 'lack of complication' but lack of sophistication that annoys people. Our wonderful 'edumacation' system doesn't do a very good job of teaching us the subtle shades of word meaning these days... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

Re: An idea to balance out tech
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">This is another aspect of the 'sophistication' problem. Attacks are calculated on a fairly simple 'point total vs. point total' basis. There is no factoring in the type of culture/society/government you have defending, nor the ability of agents from the attacker to figure out the culture and move around in it. Also, you can start intel attacks instantly once contact is established. Ridiculous. It should take months or years to establish an intelligence network in a newly contacted empire before any major projects can begin. The amount of time you have invested in building a foundation intel network is completely over-looked in the SE IV system. There should be a special 'Build Intel Network' project that you have to use on each and every target empire in order to even have the ability to stage intel projects within them.

Re: An idea to balance out tech
 

MOO2 had a better intelligence system in my opinion. But I still think that the best intel/counterintel system to date was found in SW:Rebellion. You had to pick the planet you wanted to affect, and then that planet's own defenses would have to respond to the attack. But as the attacker, you had to know what planets were colonized by your opponent (recon required) and it was a really good idea to know what intel defenses were on that planet before you attacked with your team(s), oh, and then there was the actual team and the possibility of sending a decoy team too! It was a very well thought out system, imo.

Re: An idea to balance out tech
 

Intel sabotage can be useful, if you use espionage to pick and choose your targets. The biggest problem, as I see it is the simplistic nature of the system. Ships/fleets can do most of the same jobs more easily and with more precision. At the same time, the simplicity prevents intel from being used effectively in specialty situations ships can't accomplish.

RE: the high cost of Tech Espionage, I believe it's to make it more likely to succeed (more points=harder to block).

Re: An idea to balance out tech
 

Baron if I understand you post you are saying an intell project will either fail or succeed based soley on the number of defensive points? So if a race has 0 defense the projects will always succeed and this cannot be modded?

Re: An idea to balance out tech
 

Depending on the intel project there may be a 'base' chance for it to succeed or fail, like Puppet Political parties, for example. But as far as intel defenses go, yes, it's simply a matter of spending more points to win the contest. Higher level counter-intel helps a little bit by multiplying your points. That's it.

Re: An idea to balance out tech
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It could be called [racename]embasssy or [racename]intel control centre or something, and you have to build one for each player that you want to infiltrate. It could also generate intel points. This facility would be hard for MM to add into the game (I expect) but would solve the "infiltration" question and mean that certain planets become significant targets for certain empires...

Anyway, things which I think ought to modify intel op success probabilities:

*Distance of target from your territory or (in the case of ships) from any colonised planet.

*Whether you have any population in your empire from the target species. (You could recruit and/or brainwash them to infiltrate the enemy=-)

*Whether any of your population is on the target planet/ ship.

*The happiness rating of target planets (ie discontented citizens helping enemy agents.)

*The experience rating of the target ship. (more experienced = more loyal/ more able to prevent sabotage.)

Just patching these few things in as percentage modifiers would greatly increase the (perceived) randomness and complexity of intel. I imagine it would be relatively simple for MM to implement. Also, these changes would attach added importance to things like population happiness, enemy population distribution & crew training, which can only be a good thing. You'd find yourself running one project (ie induce rioting) to increase the chances of another project working...

Also, when a planet is captured by PPP, any native troops on that planet should get the chance to retake it. This is important, IMHO.

[ August 13, 2002, 13:17: Message edited by: dogscoff ]