![]() |
Re: OT: Rating the President
Quote:
|
Re: OT: Rating the President
Quote:
as to the ppl in Cuba..Taleban?? AlQuada?? they lucky to still be alive! just mho |
Re: OT: Rating the President
Quote:
AS for a world court. As others have stated why would we support something that would be used as a weapon against us. Look I know that this is an international forum. But I do not understand why other countries cannot see what the US is trying to do. To me it seems that George W Bush is trying to make the world safer for everybody. As for drilling for oil in Alaska. If you don't agree with the Iraq policy then you should be in favor of drilling for our own oil so that we do not have to concern ourselves with the middle east. [ January 15, 2003, 17:39: Message edited by: Perrin ] |
Re: OT: Rating the President
Ah yes, Kyoto. Treaty signed by President Clinton, lost ratification by the Senate 98-0, and it's all President Bush's fault.
Ooookay. |
Re: OT: Rating the President
<$.02>
The thread was about rating George "Dubyah" wasn't it? Well IMHO he isn't doing a great job; adequate but not great. However, he IS standing up for his principles (right OR wrong) and not switching to the political view of the moment. As it pertains to world politics, he seems to say something and commits to it. Just check your own local politician on that level. To me, that earns him a few points. 'Course all those points are dismissed 'cause some of his principles are kinda' "boneheaded"..... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif </$.02> |
Re: OT: Rating the President
From peace and prosperity to war and depression. I think that says it all.
|
Re: OT: Rating the President
All I would like to know is when is it OK for the US to act? When Americans are killed in terrorist actions in other countries we are not supposed to do anything about it cause it didn't happen in our country. But when an attack happens in America we aren't supposed to do anything because people from other countries were killed too?
Why do we need a new court to say what happened on 9/11 was bad? Isn't it patently obvious? Why do we need more laws? Is there a country in the world where those kinds of things are legal now? At least GWB asked if anyone wanted to join. He could have gone and done it without even consulting anyone. But that's not how things are done anymore. But give him credit for making it perfectly clear that we were taking action with or without help from anyone else. Geoschmo |
Re: OT: Rating the President
Quote:
We were the ones that were attack idiot! You know I can respect the attack on the Pentagon because it is a valid military target. But how would you like it if your friends and relatives went to work one day and then have to watch as the buildings they work in come tumbling down. and all you can say is: Quote:
|
Re: OT: Rating the President
Quote:
Bush is responsible for us going from peace and prosperity to war and depression? War came to us. We didn't ask anyone to blow up the World Trade Center. Those plans were put in place during the previous administration. Does that mean they are Clintons fault? Of course not! They are the fault of those that did them. And secondly we aren't in a depression. We are in a recession, and a fairly mild one at that. Most of the economic problems are a result of fear caused by the downturn in t |
Re: OT: Rating the President
Oops wrong thread
[ January 26, 2003, 16:21: Message edited by: tbontob ] |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.