![]() |
Re: Atmospheres
Yes, SO2 would be good, so would NH3, and He gas giants for some more variety. They don't necessarily have to be able to support life.
|
Re: Atmospheres
That is assuming we know about ALL types of elements. There may be other we have not discovered that have the same chain properties as carbon and are not affected by chlorine. If evolution progressed on those worlds, life would be certainly different. Maybe they would say "humbug", life can not possibly exist on an oxygen world, it's just unrealistic.
Damn Terrans think they know everything. geesh [ February 16, 2003, 01:20: Message edited by: couslee ] |
Re: Atmospheres
No, there can't be other natural elements. The only elements we do not know about are the incredibly dense ones (more than about 120 protons) that can not in any way form naturally, as they are too unstable and fall apart nearly instantaneously when created in labs. There are theories about atoms being stable with something like 150 protons (I don't remember the exact number), but these can not form naturally, only in an artificial environment.
An element is an atom with a certain number of protons. If you change the number of protons, the atom acts just like a different element that has that number of protons. You can not get new elements with the same number of protons and different properties than an existing element. Quote:
I never said I knew everything. I do know some basic chemistry though. [ February 16, 2003, 01:48: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ] |
Re: Atmospheres
Well, the if go to __very__ high atom numbers, and I mean ___very____ high, we can end up in neutron star. Now, if we make a quantum leap of faith, we'l move from the electromagnetic form of life, that is us, to atomic, or "strong force" universe. This hypothetical form of existance will be in different time and space scale, almost without any potential contact with our universe. Truly alien.
|
Re: Atmospheres
to paraphrase Q "I would simply alter the physical laws of the universe". then we can have any type of lifeform we want that is capable of living in any type of atmosphere. who says that SEIV has to take place in our reality?
|
Re: Atmospheres
Quote:
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif |
Re: Atmospheres
Umm, Fyron, you're assuming we can only have atoms with integral numbers of protons. What about element number 48.75? Hmmm? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif
|
Re: Atmospheres
Quote:
However SE4 is a game where anything is possible. Slick. |
Re: Atmospheres
Of course, this whole debate about the 'suitability' of one atmosphere or another for life is presuming that there are distinct 'types' of atmospheres. This is even more UNrealistic than trying to claim that life could exist in a predominantly chlorine atmosphere. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif I hope that SE V will have much subtler gradations of 'suitability' to account for the highly variable composition of various elements that would exist in real atmospheres. Balancing atmospheric gases could be a field of terraforming all to itself. (As opposed to the very crude 'conVersion' currently offered.)
Then with temperature, gravity, and radiation levels we could finally have some believably realistic environmental management on our worlds. |
Re: Atmospheres
sounds like you are talking about stars' planetary characteristics. just a sliding bar to determine where your races habitable/tolerable ranges are. no specific atmosphere, gravity or radiation selected.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.