![]() |
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Sigh. Old topic is old, dead, beaten into the ground and trampled upon by dozens of reanimated longdead horsemen. Maerlande, you must die now :(.
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Well I told you I misread!!! But Trumanator threatened me with dire consequences if I deleted my post. So all I could do in fairness was admit I misread the date.
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Besides, you are just trying to pump your post count!
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Which of course I would never dream of doing.
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Trumanator is a bad, naughty boy. He will also be punished. I hardly care about my post count, if I did I wouldn't hit the edit button so much :P
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Quote:
You're wrong about the reason for executing prisoners. Because the French so vastly outnumbered the English, the English did not have the man-power to adequately guard all the prisoners they had captured. So when the French made an attempt to free them, either there was confusion as to who was fighting and who wasn't (leading to a lot of slain prisoners), or the commander ordered prisoners who could not be adequately guarded slain to avoid prisoners being freed and rejoining the battle. It certainly wasn't a pre-emptive move - it was a response to an attempt to free the prisoners. |
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Dude this whole thread is ridiculous everyone knows that longbows are awesome and ruled the world and crossbows are for peasants and sucked and japanese people fought with dual katanas like in that Tom Cruise documentary.
|
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Yeah, and Tom Cruise also shows in his documentary that the average american gunslinger is better at swordmanship than a samurai having trained all his life.PURE FACT.
It is also well known crossbows could barely hurt an englishman, 'cause god walks with them. |
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Sombre, as for executing prisoners, It is not my analysis, it's what these researchers came to, and they can base their theory either on some historical evidence, or not. But It is hard for me to imagine they would invent such idea like reason of execution, without any evidences. Though, I don't know the reality. French and English historians can see reasoning of execution quite differently. It's quite normal in history. We know the "truth" mostly from those nations who could write better or who won :)
As for training of longbowmen...I don't really think it takes years to train, at least if we speak about English longbowmen. Otherwise they wouldn't cost twice less then swordsmen (it's historical fact from records of vassals , who supplied their people to English army for this battle.) There is a big difference between training a sportsmen, who needs to shoot with high level of precision, and squad of archers, whose task is much simpler - just position the bow in a proper angle to horizon and use certain amount of force to deliver an arrow on a distance which he is commanded to shout. Though it requires force, it is not real "targeting" there. You are just taking part in doing shower from arrows, not shooting into the apple on a head of a princess. |
Re: Crossbows vs. Longbows
Well, longbowmen were much lower class than most swordsmen, and their equipment was also far less. The "training" bit was actually more an accident of history than anything else. A yeoman tradition of using the Longbow had spread through England and Wales, producing an excellent crop of soldiers right when England needed them.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.