.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   LA Game - Victoria - Running (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=39020)

archaeolept October 8th, 2008 02:54 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
response is norfleetish. evidence that MX is chinese is rather poor - easy to set up proxies.

Zeldor October 8th, 2008 05:41 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
But isn't it standard response? But good to hear that at least security for .2h files will be improved, it should have been done long time ago, I just hope no more people will pop up when that protection becomes active.

WraithLord October 8th, 2008 06:34 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
Yes, me too. Although if there are more of this ilk I'd rather they'd be flushed out.

Believe me there's nothing (game play wise) more frustrating than playing against someone who cheats because there's no real game here, just an abuse of the fair players.

Zeldor October 8th, 2008 06:44 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
I'm quite surprised you guys want to continue that game instead of starting new one.

WraithLord October 8th, 2008 07:12 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
I've played to long already to just throw it all away. Besides, now the game gets even more interesting since the overlord is gone.

lch October 8th, 2008 07:27 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by archaeolept (Post 644004)
evidence that MX is chinese is rather poor - easy to set up proxies.

I'm pretty sure that he's chinese, just judging from his email address.

Xanatos October 8th, 2008 09:06 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
I think i may need a sub for Rlyeh=(

Twan October 9th, 2008 04:53 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
Not really a surprise for me. I hesitated to post something about MX norfleetish amount of gems and research level when we were at war, but didn't wanted to launch a false accusation, like WL said he could just have been very lucky with sites etc...

I continued to follow this thread just to see if my impression was right. Unfortunately it was.

WraithLord October 9th, 2008 06:34 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
I had good intel on TC from very early on and got suspicious by seeing the composition of his armies, the spells he had available from early on. I kept telling myself its not fair to think like that and that he may have had great luck, income etc. However as the game progressed the inconsistency between what a nation that controls that many provinces at that stage of the game could output vs. what TC had going became staggering (to my judgment of course).

I would have said nothing anyway and let MX win just so as not to make a false accusation. However the crashed host, combined with the fact that TC turn had caused that crash due to illegal move or something caused all the alarm bells in my head to start ringing, the rest was handled by the capable hands of llama and JK.

I'm sorry this wasn't discovered earlier or I'm sure his war against you would have ended differently (remember, I came to your help, but against his hordes you stood no chance).

There's good end to that story as JK will tighten security in next patch :)

Xanatos October 10th, 2008 03:46 PM

Re: LA Game - Victoria - Running
 
how do I go about getting a sub for Rlyeh?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.