Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

Imperator Fyron

Thanks, its good to know, but shouldn't there have been some grapic showing the destruction. Love the monsters, they took out two planets that I thought could defense themselves, plus a few of my ships. All the other races are hard press countering the monster threat, neat.
You got to love them/monsters to hate them.

Lighthorse
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon6.gif

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

There should have been an explosion. Was there not an explosion? That is all that happens when a ship self destructs on boarding.

Edit:
Maybe one did not appear because you have animations off and fast tactical combat on?

[ March 22, 2004, 05:55: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

Really enjoying both stm 1.6.6 AND Major Systems Map, a slight suggestion tho Tnarg: Currently I've played Dominion, Breen and Tholia. Now I dont really want balance as thats the great part about trek, BUT, the poor, poor Breen! So few planets to colonize, a sneaky backdoor for the Dominion to waltz thru! Cardassians, Ferengi and Tholians on the other borders! Phew!

Perhaps a few more Ice/Oxygen planets for the breen to play with? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

1.6.6 Bugs

Tholian Speech files, 'We (off) a treaty of non intercourse' off should be offer (might be in NA, pretty sure its NI tho)

Questions

in 1.5.1 Klingon cloaking was better than Romulan Cloaking, has this been changed? Taking into account both Klingon and Romulan Advanced Cloaking II Roms could be detected at 5, Klings at 6.


*sigh* Atrocities this is heaven, coming for a long since frustrated BoTF player. I know i keep saying this but you just keep on making this mod better!

My *only* wish: Bigger Borg ships http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/shock.gif

[ March 22, 2004, 08:04: Message edited by: BlackRose ]

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Breen mines? Tholian mines? I thought that small mine hull is the the same for all the races.
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

Sorry about the mine thing, not sure what/how I got that info http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

I just edited it out of the post to avoid confusion!

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

I think that Klingon's cloaker is better, since Klingon Adv. Cloaking Device II prevents lvl 6 scans, but Romulan Adv. Cloaking Device II prevents lvl 5 scans only.

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Is that a bug or a feature tho? I would have thought that the Roms would have better cloaking, unless its purely a balancing issue?

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">code:</font><hr /><pre style="font-size:x-small; font-family: monospace;">Name := Support Craft
Group := Support Craft
Description := Smaller ships and and hanger bay. </pre><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">This is from TechArea.txt. BUT I D/Led the patch, not the full Version.

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

Just wanted you to know that re-installing the mod fixed my map problem. Thanks

Re: STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Breen mines? Tholian mines? I thought that small mine hull is the the same for all the races.
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Say whaaat?