Re: Sylvania
 

Ok then I'm going AI, sorry about this.

At least they are definitively the weakest nation and don't have a very big impact on the game.

Re: Sylvania
 

Well, in that case, I'm going AI as well.

I'm fairly big and powerful but I don't give myself any chance of actually winning - so if I stay in I'm just in as a spoiler, and I'm overcommitted to boot.

Good luck, and thanks for the geat game.

Haida Gwaii
 

I guess it's your lack of research that leads to that decision? I'd suggest to try and find a sub first before setting your nation to AI. Because there are always LOTS of people looking for games and apart from the "probably not winning" thing somebody can still do some good with the nation, I think. You could even decide the outcome of the game, depending on who you ally up with.

Re: Haida Gwaii
 

Well, that's the issue - I'm not interested in playing just to be a spoiler and deciding the winner. The AI will probably keep attacking Kharam Dzu on its own.

And there's a shortage of subs, actually.

But it's too late, I already set myself to AI. If there had been more than 10 hrs left until host I would've started looking for a sub.

Re: Haida Gwaii
 

For anyone following this game, a turn ago Lolomo and I both attacked a province owned by our mutual(ai) enemy.

I then staled, and this turn recieved a message from Lolomo claiming that the battle that took place in that province meant I broke our NAP. Underneath that message were 2 reports of sanguinia attacking my nation - the defenders won both battles.

Re: Haida Gwaii
 

That is incorrect. I had attacked Sylvania's fort the turn before you attacked. So last turn I had the fort under siege already when you attacked me. The same turn that you attacked me, I captured the fortress.

Since this occured right after Haida Gwai turned AI, leaving only you and me in this game, I assumed that this was intentional.

Since there are only the two of us playing, I would certainly agree to a rollback so that you do not stale, and so that you can see your turn and we can be clear on what happened.

If the attack was a mistake, then I can certainly agree to letting our NAP remain in place until you are ready for war.

Of course, if you think my two defeated probing attacks is of any advantage to you, we can also continue as is.

Re: Haida Gwaii
 

Aww hell, I just sent you a PM telling you what, as far as I know, happened.
I apologise if I did attack you and violate our NAP - it was certainly not my intention to do so, I'm almost certain it was a Sylvania province I attacked but perhaps I am mistaken(the turn was taken quickly).
But there are only 2 of us left and I have little free time these days. If you wish we can continue this war now, or we can put the NAP back in place - I don't mind either way.

Re: Haida Gwaii
 

Ok, let's have the NAP back in place then, I have a score to settle with Sylvania first, even though they've turned AI, I want to get back at them for raiding me for 10 turns =)

Re: Haida Gwaii
 

I can't believe I forgot to submit my turn..

Re: Haida Gwaii
 

Don't worry, nothing much happened on my end either =)