Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

Welcome back Y. Hope you had a merry Xmas yourself. :)

Who was the other stale btw? Ulm & Niefelheim are the only two who have resubmitted turns, but I don't think it was either of them.

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

Currently llamaserver is not showing a recent stale by Caelum so I think the rollback will keep you current.

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

I think Nifleheims turn is in, I hadn't updated to the newer turn when I saw that it had staled, so I merely resent in my own turn that time, should work, no? Llamaserver gave me the OK.

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

I'm confused. You had troops moving. Are you saying you were the other stale?

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

No, for the rerolled turn. I had seen the rerolled turn and resubmitted that turn file before reading the forums and also before getting the new turn file for the turn we didnt do (due to the reroll) so im still good, right? since I never changed turn files?

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

Yes he was the other stale...

He mentioned that he saw the turn bit before he could load it he saw the roll back that I caught.

He insists that he only loaded the rollback turn and if thats the case (as thejeff) thinks, then there is no reason to wait and to go ahead and force host.

The only other (public) potential problem is ME...

I loaded the other turn but never turned it in, thejeff says that also is ok as it will oNLY pick up stuff that was turned in.

soooooooooooo, If the 2 that turned their turn in, DIDN'T turn in the new turn and then tried to turn in the rolled back turn we should be OK.

Guess we will know soon.

Should we force host NOW and see if its screwed up we can get it fixed?:doh:

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

Yeah, my understanding is you should be fine.

I get that we rolled back because two people staled, but are we waiting til sunday just so they can stale again? Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought Yskonen and Caelum were back a couple of days ago. When he gets his turn in we are only waiting for one more and then force host, right?

I guess what I'm asking is - does that player, whoever he or she is, even realize we're waiting for only two players, and not the whole lot of us?

Or did I get into someone's crazy pills? :crazy:

Happy New Year!

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

ugh yes please, I would hate to stale, ive been submitting my turns within an hour or two of each new turn going out usually.

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

Maybe I'm not picking this stuff up as well as I thought I was.

Niefelheim (Xanatos) had troops moving, so he could not have been one of the stales, right?

And he should be fine doing nothing or sending the same turn again, right?

GB, you rolled back because you said two people staled, right?

Caelum (Yskonen) was one, right?

I don't suggest force hosting until the two who staled send in turns, but if someone looks at llamaserver only, they might think we're all just waiting to do our turns on sunday, right?

So if you force host now, we will still have two stales, right?

Re: RUNNING: First Newbie game, let's discuss how we proceed here
 

Yes Calem was one tat staled.

And YES you make sense, It seems he should submit his turn so the game has his records.

Hell, I don't know....PM thejeff, he knows how this thing works better than I do.:eek: